timmy
Oct 21, 2006
6:29 PM | | ;
|
they got lucky against lazy other wise they have not beat any one
|
| |
|
timmieeeee!
Oct 21, 2006
7:02 PM | |
visitor
Oct 21, 2006
7:52 PM | | | ; |
Timmy, go play with your matchbox cars and stay off the computer. It wasn`t luck during the lazy/dawg game, the dawgs showed up and lazy just got lazy.
| |
|
jimmy
Oct 21, 2006
7:55 PM | | | ; |
must be a lazy player. dude, give it up. dawgs are good, they got it together this fall.
| |
|
Who cares
Oct 21, 2006
8:03 PM | | | ; |
Who cares. I hit their photo chick last night. hee hee
| |
|
visitor
Oct 21, 2006
8:18 PM | | | ; |
And I went hoggin and met your wife. Leave the "photo chick" out of this.
| |
|
kind of agree
Oct 21, 2006
8:29 PM | | | ; |
They`ve never blown anyone out. Well thats not true. Blew out cowbell, thats saying a ton, beat outcast. There other wins were by a touchdown. A team they should`ve whooped up and down the field, they didn`t even score on. They made that loudmouth Fat Ron keep on talking rather then putting him in his place.
If nothing else I say they are underachieving.
| |
|
agree
Oct 21, 2006
8:58 PM | | | ; |
I agree. But, they do have some of the top receivers in the league. They make the plays. I think they make the difference.
I do agree with Timmy on the pussy part. Look, Fat Ron talks shit, then all these losers talk about the girl taking pictures of them. If that was my girl or even a friend, I would have wrote shit on here to shut everyone up. It would make me play that much harder in every game!
| |
|
Thats right
Oct 21, 2006
9:02 PM | | | ; |
Over-rated team! Over-rated players! Over-rated photo bitch!
Lazy should have won. Bad,bad calls.
| |
|
heres one
Oct 21, 2006
10:54 PM | | | ; |
Here`s one for you all! Who the f**k cares! We will all see who the #1 team is in a few weeks, and then everyone else who would then be called "losers" can complain on how bad the refs were and whatever other excuses they have. In my book a win is a win. So what if they didn`t blow anyone out. They won didnt they, more than alot of other teams on here can say.
| |
|
visitor
Oct 22, 2006
8:23 AM | | | ; |
Just because you won a game, doesn`t mean you are good. It just means you were lucky. A win is a win, but you still aren`t that good.
| |
|
OH YEAH
Oct 22, 2006
6:48 PM | | | ; |
The dawgs SUCK big dic! They lost to DWC. Over rated team for sure, does anyone know if thier gal was there taking pictures?
| |
|
Cutie
Oct 22, 2006
6:53 PM | | | ; |
If the cutie was there, tell her to post pictures. Im sure I speak for other dudes, we would love to see dawgs eating grass. ha!
| |
|
Still good
Oct 22, 2006
7:41 PM | | | ; |
Win some, lose some. They win more and thats all that matters.
| |
|
Let see
Oct 22, 2006
7:49 PM | | | ; |
They lost a total of 2 games. Does this mean they suck? No. It means that they are a normal flag football team that has a life outside of Sunday mornings. Lets see. They have a nice looking chick that came out to take pictures of them and it wasn`t any of their wives or girlfriends. Can anyone on any other team say that? No. That is the only thing I see that makes them lucky. When it comes to football, they are a good team who win most and lost a few.
| |
|
To much time
Oct 22, 2006
8:10 PM | | | ; |
We give this sorry ass team to much time on the messageboard.
| |
|
Visitor
Oct 22, 2006
8:41 PM | | | ; |
I just looked at the score. It wasn`t a blow out for pete sake. DWC GOT LUCKY!
| |
|
Yes
Oct 22, 2006
9:39 PM | | | ; |
DWC had luck on their side today. And it brought them a win againt the pups!
| |
|
Laugh
Oct 23, 2006
6:07 AM | | | ; |
What a nice thing to come into work and read first thing this mornin. I LOL that the Dawgs choked this weekend. Just like the deadskins. haa haaa
| |
|
Laugh`s Boss
Oct 23, 2006
12:06 PM | | | ; |
See me in my office please...
| |
|
QB
Oct 23, 2006
12:37 PM | | | ; |
For those of you who say DWC got lucky, did any of you even watch the game?
They had a 7-0 lead after their first drive and then went down 10-7 and needed a long FG to tie the game in the second half. DWC should have put up more points, but had some major setbacks including a BS pass interference call that took away a TD. The game winning TD was luck, but it was there all game long.
| |
|
QB 2
Oct 23, 2006
8:24 PM | | | ; |
Feel better QB? Stick your chest out some more. No matter what you say, Mudd is a better team than DWC. Any given Sunday man.
| |
|
QB
Oct 24, 2006
1:27 PM | | | ; |
"Any given Sunday" as seen this past Sunday. I think they are evenly matched. The two played in the playoffs last year and MudDawgs beat them 14-0 with DWC barely able to put a team together. They gave up big plays to a 1 handed receiver so what does that say about their defense?
| |
|
|