N/A
Jul 09, 2005
9:13 PM | | ;
|
What are the odds to win the Bark Bowl for all 16 teams?
 
|
| |
|
LINE
Jul 11, 2005
9:10 AM | | | ; |
Early odds are out, but there could be some movement depending on the action after the brackets come out whenever that is.
Bark Bowl odds to win it all
Kerns 3:1
Sharks 6:1
Nautilus 8:1
Lions 10:1
CC NOVAs 15:1
Lazy Sundae 15:1
Rhinos 15:1
Playmakers 20:1
Mudd Dawgs 24:1
Goin Deep 24:1
Broadlands 40:1
Highlawn 60:1
S&S 60:1
Magnums 100:1
Best of 100:1
Dynasty 200:1
| |
|
ooking
Jul 11, 2005
9:19 AM | | | ; |
who are Nautilus??? where are they from did they play in the BB last year??
| |
|
r
Jul 11, 2005
9:54 AM | | | ; |
Nautilus-Harrisonburg team. They played in the BB last year but didn`t have their whole squad. Were in the final game in the B bracket in states if i`m not mistaken.
| |
|
atabase
Jul 11, 2005
11:05 AM | | | ; |
They went 3-2 in last years Bark Bowl. Wins against Pitbulls, Nova`s, and Dietz. Loses against Goin Deep and Kerns.
| |
|
al story
Jul 11, 2005
11:12 AM | | | ; |
Nautilus is not that good just lucky because they really should of lost the first game and been knocked out when they lost the second game last year.
| |
|
r
Jul 11, 2005
11:47 AM | | | ; |
How do you explain their state tournament record if this team is no good. Like I said, had a couple key players not here last year. Not a team I`d like to draw against in the opening round.
| |
|
watcher
Jul 11, 2005
12:30 PM | | | ; |
Dont sleep on the Magnums.
For a first year team they had to play one hell of a schedule including 4 A PLAYOFF teams and the B CHAMPION who they lost to by an extra point just go look for yourself
I would not have them ranked that low.
| |
|
Jul 11, 2005
12:57 PM | | | ; |
Nautilus is a lot like the Rhinos. Not fast or flashy, but will beat you with the basics. Hell of a goal line D too.
| |
|
us 21
Jul 11, 2005
11:52 PM | | | ; |
Fellas, we just appreciate the chance of coming up and playing against some of the best teams in the state. Our league isn`t big enough yet to have a spring season, so any tournament we can get into is a tune-up for the fall. I think last year, no one knew us and we kind of surprised a few teams, but that obviously isn`t the case this year. Anyways, again, we appreciate you all allowing us (and Highlawn) to come up and play and yes, last year seemed hotter than 80. See you all on the 7th and thanks for the defense props Sef, youre with Lazy, right?
| |
|
Jul 12, 2005
8:30 AM | | | ; |
Nautilus, we will gladly take Sef 81`s comparison to your squad. Hopefully, we can duplicate the Bark Bowl success you had last year.
See you on the 7th.
| |
|
r
Jul 12, 2005
10:56 AM | | | ; |
Magnum watcher-I remember reading a quote much like the one above at the begining of the regular season. And then what happened?
| |
|
LINE
Jul 18, 2005
9:52 AM | | | ; |
Okay I see the schedule is up and there has been some early action that bumped some of the odds.
Bark Bowl odds to win it all
Kerns 5:2
Sharks 4:1
Nautilus 10:1
Lions 12:1
Rhinos 15:1
CC NOVAs 18:1
Lazy Sundae 18:1
Playmakers 20:1
Mudd Dawgs 30:1
Goin Deep 30:1
Broadlands 44:1
Highlawn 50:1
S&S 50:1
Magnums 80:1
Best of 120:1
Dynasty 200:1
Here are the opening lines on the first round games
MuddDawgs (+11) Kerns
S&S (-10) Dynasty
Lions (-2) CCR NOVAs
Magnums (+7) Playmakers
Goin Deep (-3) Broadland`s
Sharks (-16) BOBW
Highlawn (+6) Rhinos
Lazy Sundae (+3) Nautilus
| |
|
Jul 18, 2005
11:41 AM | | | ; |
I think these odds need to be adjusted-
| |
|
lous
Jul 18, 2005
3:18 PM | | | ; |
How can any team that did not even play in the spring so they are probly at least very rusty be a 16 point favorite over any team and then you have Kerns who I didn`t see in the spring either beat a 6-1 spring team by 11. Take Muddawgs and BOBW and the points for easy money and the Rhinos are still getting no respect they will cover and then some. Don`t know about Nautilus but you have 2 or maybe 3 teams who have not played a snap since last year picked at the top to win it all and there are good teams who have been playing all spring. Like I said, rediculous
| |
|
t this
Jul 18, 2005
3:40 PM | | | ; |
LIONS vs. NOVAs
Perennial powerhouses match up in the first round. It looks like we got a good old back-yard battle. I`m going to need a front row seat for this one.
| |
|
Jul 18, 2005
5:58 PM | | | ; |
LIONS vs. NOVAs
I second that! What a great game to start the day with. These two powerhouse teams have had quite a rivalry over the past 3 years. A definate must see game!
| |
|
dds
Jul 18, 2005
6:10 PM | | | ; |
Odds the Lions will lose their first two games and still be one of the high favorites to win fall:
2-1
| |
|
an
Jul 18, 2005
7:57 PM | | | ; |
thank you for the props on nautilus. all i can say is that we will not have our full team this year once again. please dont pick us to win it all. we dont like having a bullseye on us. thank you for the props. we arnt a flashy team never have been. all i can say is go to the vffa site and there is a pic of us. we are young. no one over 30. just a bunch of country boys who like playing f-ball. we dont talk trash. but its ok if other teams talk to us. we just laugh. were slow and fat. id pick us at 500-1 odds to win it all. good luck fellows. we will try and get at least 8 of us to come up there.
| |
|
us21
Jul 19, 2005
10:36 AM | | | ; |
Just for the record Slow Man, you`re safety here is 30 1/2. Well, make that 35 1/2 since i played in last yr`s BB.
| |
|
|