Collinsworth
Jul 19, 2005 12:01 PM | | ;
|
MuddDawgs/Kerns/S&S/Dynasty
Make no mistake about it. Kerns will cruise through their first 2 games. The first game against MuddDawgs will be more of a contest. Their second game which could be a major blowout. It looks like their third game could be against Lazy Sundae or Nautilus but they would have the advantage of talent and energy due to less games played. Go ahead and put Kerns into the final 4 with 3 games played. MuddDawgs will have to fight their way through losers bracket to get back in it. Looks like they might be playing Goin Deep to make the elite 8. I will get to that later on. Dynasty will be 2 and done but S&S could possibly make the elite 8 but that is as far as they go.
Lions/NOVAs/Magnums/Playmakers
Key game in this bracket is Lions/NOVAs. The winner of this game will roll through to the final 4 with 3 games played and S&S might be the third game. Looks like the loser of this game will have to fight through Lazy Sundae/Nautilus/Rhinos and then the Shrks to make the final 4 but if they win game 3 they could make it to the final 4 in another bracket. I give the edge here to the Lions advancing to the final 4 in 3 games. There is not a lot of info out there about Playmakers but it looks like they should win the first game at least before losing the second and third game. Magnums will face Lions or NOVAs in the second game. That will be the end of the line for them.
Goin Deep/Broadland/Sharks/BOBW
BOBW is a dark horse team but unless they are My Plumber undercover they should not focus on the first game but instead they should focus on winning the second game against the Goin Deep/Broadland loser. Sharks will win their first 2 easily but then it looks like they will play NOVAs/Lazy Sundae/Nautilus in the third game. I am going to go against the grain here and predict the Sharks lose early momentum and lose this game to one of these teams that has the experience of playing 4/5 games in a day in the heat. the final 4 team from this bracket will be the loser bracket challenger. After they win game 1 and lose game 2 to the Sharks Goin Deep will most likely lose to the MuddDawgs and be out after game 3.
Highlawn/Rhinos/Lazy Sundae/Nautilus
This is the hardest bracket but you have go with the Rhinos who are on a roll. Rhinos will get by Highlawn and will also squeak by Lazy Sundae/Nautilus once again. Then they will play and beat the MuddDawgs to get into the final 4. Lazy Sundae/Nautilus is a toss up but it won`t matter as the winner will lose the next game setting up a 3rd game match with the NOVAs. The winner of that game I predict will beat the Sharks to get into the final 4. The Lazy Sundae/Nautilus loser will beat Highlawn knocking them out after 2 games but will go on to lose to Kerns in the elite 8.
For summary the final 4 will be-
Kerns(3-0),Lions(3-0), NOVAS/Nautilus/Lazy Sundae(3-1), Rhinos(3-0)

|
| |
|
sting
Jul 19, 2005 2:20 PM | | ; |
Collinsworth- I think this is very accurate- I am interested in hearing your ideas on the final!!!!
The public wants MORE!!!!!!!!!!!

| |
|
e
Jul 19, 2005 3:30 PM | | ; |
I think this scenario looks believeable with two changes.
#1 Novas will go 3-0 into the semifinals
#2 Rhinos will lose in the round of eight

| |
|
r
Jul 19, 2005 4:00 PM | | ; |
Don`t put too much stock on what a team did in the spring. Mediocre teams usually bring the ringers out for the bark bowl.

| |
|
an
Jul 19, 2005 6:49 PM | | ; |
just dont pick nautilus for the title game. i dont want to play in 5 games again. i couldnt even get in bed that night. i had to take a day off from work. bottom line is every tournament someone thinks they know who is going to win.
just dont pick us. we slow and old. quote the slow man.

| |
|
Jul 19, 2005 8:31 PM | | ; |
I feel your pain and know your grief. Last year we played 4 games, and I had to be up for work at 3am. This year, I already put in my leave slip.

| |
|
an
Jul 19, 2005 11:12 PM | | ; |
sef 81. are you the tall receiver. i remember a reciever in the semi at states complaining that i held his shorts on a play. is that you? if it is me and u had good laugh about that. and i did.
u all played a great game. we was close. outside of two big plays and our goal line d. it would have went your way. u all played a clean game. i give big props on that. see u on the 7th. take it easy on us. we havnt played since that day in december.

| |
|
Jul 20, 2005 8:42 AM | | ; |
Lazy always plays a clean game, and you can always count on #10 to give you some added motivation.

| |
|
ut
Jul 20, 2005 10:38 AM | | ; |
i heard some teams may be trying to pulL some stuff And bring out ringers for the bark bowl. that shiZzle is wrong man, just wrong, anYway, good luck to everyone the 7th

| |
|
r
Jul 20, 2005 10:57 AM | | ; |
It aint wrong unless teams don`t have all the players on the roster for the Bark Bowl.

| |
|
n
Jul 20, 2005 11:30 AM | | ; |
If teams are pulling players for the BOWL then that`s stupid- you play with YOUR team not someone else`s.
Trust me- we know who plays with who and if people start pulling players then we know they can`t win with there own. Go pick people up for the BOWL and prove to the league that you can`t win with your team.

| |
|
r
Jul 20, 2005 11:59 AM | | ; |
If they are on your roster than they they are on YOUR TEAM right? Bark Bowl is a good time to try new players out because if you keep winning you know they will get some reps. Don`t get mad because teams are trying to get better, at least we don`t try to STEAL people from other teams.

| |
|
n
Jul 20, 2005 12:20 PM | | ; |
Steal- does that mean kidnap?
How can one steal - please explain?

| |
|
nion
Jul 20, 2005 1:10 PM | | ; |
You don`t make any sense. Visitor is right, if they`re on your roster, then they`re on your team. According to your logic, the only way a team can add new players is to find someone that`s never played in the league before?

| |
|
r
Jul 20, 2005 1:16 PM | | ; |
In steal I mean- Captains recruiting players already on another team, or trying to get a player to defect while still under contract. I don`t mean holding players against their own free will, or trying to get ransom for a player although I might have to try that.

| |
|
n
Jul 20, 2005 1:20 PM | | ; |
HAHHAHAHA!!! You mean not incorporating Jery Jones or Dan Synder techniques. Hmmmm might be at fault there.

| |
|
Jul 20, 2005 3:17 PM | | ; |
I was the qb down at states. The tall guy is Dre #10. Good player if you can get him to shut his mouth.

| |
|
tor
Jul 20, 2005 5:09 PM | | ; |
Sef, just get Dre a bigger mouth guard.

| |
|
ames
Jul 20, 2005 5:12 PM | | ; |
And you know who I am, right? I`M RICK JAMES BITCH! Now Shut yo mouf and play some ball!!!

| |
|
ING
Jul 20, 2005 6:01 PM | | ; |
Where is Collinsworth- the PUBLIC wants more!!!!! Finish it up for us and tell us more interesting news in the flag world.

| |
|
an
Jul 20, 2005 7:19 PM | | ; |
ok, cool man, i remember u. and yes, that dre does talk the whole game. just remeber we havnt played sinced states and we wont have our whole team. dont kill us to bad. no qb scrambles either. ill be sucking wind by the second play

| |
|
Aug 08, 2005 9:19 AM | | ; |
good predictions!

| |
|
|