QB Jack
May 10, 2011
4:36 PM | | ;
|
Round 1:
Nemesis 7
Rhinos 14
Rhinos are a playoff team.
Bearcats 0
RainCity 7
I don`t know either of these teams.
Vegas Nights 14
United 17
Close match up.
Warriors 7
Stone Cold 21
Dante Culpepper plays for Stone Cold
Raincity 0
Outlaws 21
No match
Stone Cold 14
TNT 17
Have to give it to the number #1 seed. Could really go either way. I don`t know anything about TNT.
Round 2:
Rhinos 10
Outlaws 14
Rhinos are getting a bit slower.
United 21
TNT 7
Too much experience for TNT to handle
Championship Game:
Outlaws 21
United 14
Close game but the Outlaws will prevail.
|
| |
|
one n done
May 10, 2011
11:44 PM | | | ; |
united will be one n done! history is never wrong
| |
|
Nemesis
May 11, 2011
1:22 AM | |
championship game
May 11, 2011
9:22 AM | | | ; |
I got United beating Outlaws. Good picks QB Jack. Who looks like Dante Culpeper? lmao
| |
|
Hard To Tell
May 11, 2011
9:30 AM | | | ; |
Some of the these teams are in the B playoffs because they have had serious attendance issues. So it all depends on which teams have some semblacne of their full roster show up.
| |
|
reply to hard to tell
May 11, 2011
10:11 AM | | | ; |
Thats a good point. Attendance issues are always an issue with teams that dont pad their team with extras. Im talkin about the teams that have 10 guys on the sideline at any given moment. Usually everyone makes it out to the playoffs so this could be a toss up!
| |
|
Big Johnson
May 11, 2011
10:25 AM | | | ; |
Sooo, you`re saying the teams that made the A playoffs didn`t have key people miss any games?
| |
|
no you big johnson douche
May 11, 2011
10:28 AM | | | ; |
Its a fact that a good portion of the teams that are playing in the b playoffs had key missing players. if you were out on the field you might have noticed it. people rushing to the field at kickoff, 7 to start, the list goes on. on the other hand, teams like lazy, the truth, outcast always have a full squad on the sideline at all times. no excuses, just saying that at least 3-4 teams on this b list should have made it to A had they had their full squad this season.
| |
|
fact
May 11, 2011
10:33 AM | | | ; |
That is on them. Guys that really want to play show up on time. Regardless of how many guys are on a team/sideline --- you can only put 8 on the field !!!!
| |
|
to fact
May 11, 2011
10:37 AM | | | ; |
def true and not sayin nothing about it. just stating that attendance issues have caused teams to lose games they normally would have won. no excuses. good job to teams that can get their players to show up every single sunday and on time. that in itself is impressive. for some teams its like pulling teeth to field even 8.
| |
|
Money
May 11, 2011
10:39 AM | | | ; |
I think this year , the economy had a lot to do with the number of teams and players. I see the fall having a better turnout !
| |
|
Big Johnson
May 11, 2011
2:01 PM | | | ; |
Listen you chode. Whenever an "A" team loses a game it`s b/c they were missing key players or that`s why they are in B and not A playoffs. COME ON!!! While yes, I grant you from one season to the next a team might not have the exact same team and that`s why they don`t do as well from one season to the next. But that`s when the coach has to recruit or take the season off. i.e. Dietze this season.
To play a season with only 10 or 11 guys is foolish. Of course people are going to have stuff happen during the season and not be able to come to a game or two.
But to say your team went 2-4 or 3-3 b/c they were missing key players is lame.
Aside from experience what makes an A team an A team is the fact that players are willing to step up and play other positions when needed.
One example being when Scav`s starting QB was out against Pain. (I think it was Pain at least.) Mike Nunya stepped up and played QB and someone stepped in and filled Mike`s roll at WR/RB or where ever. Situations like that are what make teams like Truth, Outcast, and Lazy competitive week in week out.
Listen, every team has a bad season. Maybe they tried to put in a new style O, maybe they tried to run shorthanded, or maybe thier new players didn`t work out. Regardless the reason, to say a team would`ve made A had they not been missing key players is r-tarded.
Maybe the newer teams to the A playoff party deserve some credit.
| |
|
Bigger Johnson
May 11, 2011
2:18 PM | | | ; |
The merits of a large/small roster aside, there is a big difference between players filling in at other positions and having to play the whole game with less than 8 (which also means you are kicking off both halves).
| |
|
Lets See
May 11, 2011
2:18 PM | | | ; |
Theres maybe 3 teams that had a chance at A that didnt make it.
Rhinos - Alter Ego is probably on the same level as they are. and theres two teams clearly better then them in the division. not a huge surprise to miss A.
United - Made A playoffs before, but lost to the Punishers. Maybe they should have won, maybe not. Either way its not a huge surprise they were on the cusp and didn`t make it.
The West didn`t have any A teams that missed the A playoffs.
Outlaws - Yea they had a good run last Fall. And Maybe the Imposters surprised some this season. but again, not a big deal to have made B playoffs.
So if you switch Punishers, Alter Ego, and Imposters and put them in B and put Rhinos, United, and Outlaws in A. Wouldn`t you still be having somewhat the same conversation?
Looks to me like your trying to just make an excuse for losing in the B playoffs.
| |
|
^
May 11, 2011
2:20 PM | | | ; |
Wolves rarely have more than 10 guys at a game and are always at the top. Good teams find ways to win regarless of who shows up.
| |
|
hilarity
May 11, 2011
2:21 PM | | | ; |
whoever said lazy shows up on time and has a full sideline has never seen them play. sef usually makes it there by halftime, they usually have about 4 or 5 guys on the sidelines and like half of them play both ways. not a good example chief.
| |
|
Dez Nutz
May 15, 2011
2:50 AM | | | ; |
Smh ur very wrong QB Jack lol
| |
|
|