Player
Mar 17, 2010
10:11 PM | | ;
|
Now that the divisions are posted what are everyones`s thoughts?
|
| |
|
Open East
Mar 17, 2010
10:22 PM | | | ; |
is definitely the toughest...
| |
|
Open Central
Mar 17, 2010
10:25 PM | |
^^^^^^^
Mar 18, 2010
7:51 AM | | | ; |
Have to agree. Open Central looks to be the toughest.
| |
|
True
Mar 18, 2010
8:11 AM | | | ; |
Lazy is in the butter division , so they will get another top seed by default. The East will be run by Pitbulls and Dietze , but the Central looks rough. Every game will be tight in that division. Central by far.
| |
|
dunno about that
Mar 18, 2010
9:45 AM | | | ; |
butter division? 5 of those teams were in the A playoffs last year thats more than any other division.
| |
|
True
Mar 18, 2010
10:10 AM | | | ; |
But did you take a look at their records? Lazy won seven games in a tough division while the other teams you are speaking of won 3 or 4 games tops.
| |
|
Player
Mar 18, 2010
1:51 PM | | | ; |
I don`t Lazy will have it that easy in that division. The Rhinos and a couple other teams could be a challenge for them. The past doesn`t matter because teams change over time whether its old age or a loss of talent.
| |
|
True
Mar 18, 2010
1:56 PM | | | ; |
Well put. I hope you are correct.
| |
|
Player
Mar 18, 2010
2:14 PM | |
Lazy
Mar 18, 2010
9:42 PM | | | ; |
No we suck as always people! Don`t worry about us!
| |
|
well
Mar 18, 2010
9:47 PM | | | ; |
dummy if you read correctly, no one said Lazy would suck. It was said that there were teams out there that may challenge them in their division.
| |
|
Lazy
Mar 18, 2010
10:05 PM | |
well
Mar 18, 2010
10:34 PM | | | ; |
if thats the way you feel about your squad then it is what it is
| |
|
Lazy
Mar 18, 2010
10:43 PM | | | ; |
Yeah i do. We all know we suck the big one lmoa!
| |
|
East
Mar 23, 2010
10:53 AM | | | ; |
and it`s not even close. Pain and Wolves are the only good teams in Central. West is a joke.
| |
|
joke huh
Mar 29, 2010
6:52 PM | | | ; |
looks like in the east and central there were a lot of blow outs....... Real tough divisions. lol
| |
|
Hmmm
Mar 30, 2010
10:50 AM | | | ; |
I would have liked to see Pain with the old Wolves QB, and Hollywood at WR. They might have been able to run with the Wolves.
| |
|
re: Hmmm
Mar 30, 2010
3:28 PM | | | ; |
That team would have been the favorite to win it all this year IMO. Hollywood`s arm was, and now is, the weak spot on the team.
| |
|
Ole Noodle Arm
Mar 30, 2010
5:03 PM | | | ; |
He`s still got enough of an arm to get the job done.
| |
|
How
Mar 30, 2010
5:16 PM | | | ; |
are they favorite when they are 3rd or 4th best in their own division? Wolves are the team to beat, along with the Scavs and Pens
| |
|
Re: How
Mar 30, 2010
5:53 PM | | | ; |
Pens are not better than Pain. Wolves have their number for sure, but Scavengers still have to prove it. Probably they are 2nd or 3rd best in their own division right now...
| |
|
pens
Mar 30, 2010
6:41 PM | | | ; |
are average "B" at best
| |
|
Wolves player
Mar 30, 2010
7:32 PM | | | ; |
Look for the Wolves to win everything. Most of yall are old and out of shape, dont worry I`ll make sure to let you bums touch the trophie.
| |
|
Re: RE: How
Apr 05, 2010
0:32 AM | | | ; |
I`m not a fan of either of the teams but I did the research to show you`re nothing but opinion.
Oct 12, 2008 Pens vs. Pain W21-17
Jul 12, 2009 Pens vs. Pain L7-13
One for Pens, One for Pain. 2010 is the year to prove who is better than who.
Secondly, Wolves/Pens have met twice and in each instance the wolves have won by only six points. In fact the score was 0-6. The Wolves are obviously better but I give the props to the pens for holding the Wolves to such a small margin of victory. Low scoring games like those are scary and sometimes means that it can go either way.
Lastly...Who are the Scavengers? Prove something.
| |
|
o contrar mon frar
Apr 06, 2010
1:47 PM | | | ; |
Re: Re: How
You have erred as well in your research but mostly by no fault of your own. The Penetrators went by another name at one point. I believe it was the Titans. I think Pain has them beat in the head to head something like 4-2. Just sayin`. Start with BBowl 06.
| |
|
facts
Apr 06, 2010
11:58 PM | | | ; |
actually 2 different teams but a few old titans do play on the pens now
| |
|
RE: o contrar mon frar
Apr 07, 2010
9:46 PM | | | ; |
The Pens have never gone by any other name.
| |
|
Player
Apr 07, 2010
9:58 PM | | | ; |
They combined with some of the Titan players a few seasons back. The others formed the Nighthawks.
| |
|
|