baller
Jun 21, 2009 6:34 PM | | ;
|
i got sef and lazy going down to the c champs! what do u think?
|
| |
|
ha ha
Jun 21, 2009 7:39 PM | | ; |
C`mon lions not you pushing it. Congrats but don`t get too big headed.
| |
|
I heard
Jun 21, 2009 8:00 PM | | ; |
Lions want to back out of the game against Lazy.
| |
|
baller
Jun 21, 2009 10:10 PM | | ; |
i got a dub on the lions
| |
|
Lions QB 7
Jun 22, 2009 6:39 AM | | ; |
Anybody got a scouting report on Lazy?? They watched us play but we have no idea what they do.
| |
|
re: Linos QB 7
Jun 22, 2009 7:15 AM | | ; |
They beat their opponents SILLY. So start laughing baldy!
| |
|
baller
Jun 22, 2009 9:16 AM | | ; |
they are slow, can`t catch, and u can beat them deep all day long!
| |
|
Lions
Jun 22, 2009 9:52 AM | | ; |
should attack the middle safeties, slowest in the league, only reason they dont get destroyed is because they mostly send 3
| |
|
LIONS
Jun 22, 2009 11:05 AM | | ; |
just go ahead and claim the victory ova lazy! Then they can go play c and hopefully win a game lol!
| |
|
Jmillz
| 
|
Jun 22, 2009 12:48 PM | |
^
Jun 22, 2009 3:08 PM | | ; |
yeah Jmillz "um" is right. I mean what kind of people congratulate the champions? Maybe we should just walk off the court and not shake hands or keep telling ourselves we coulda beat them.
HEY UM! Go suck on your gramammy`s ****atoo!
| |
|
haha
Jun 22, 2009 3:40 PM | | ; |
you must be a teammate, its ok man, tnt will get another chance in novice next season..
| |
|
re: haha
Jun 22, 2009 4:16 PM | | ; |
actually I played for the Bulldogs #69 any further questions? sorry if I believe in sportsmanship.
| |
|
prediction...
Jun 22, 2009 6:38 PM | | ; |
Lazy 36 - Lions 12...should be good to watch in between the B semis & B finals
| |
|
i dont
Jun 22, 2009 8:00 PM | | ; |
have the lions scoring a td at all.
| |
|
who cares
Jun 22, 2009 9:01 PM | | ; |
about any of those games, plus lazy hasnt won a title in years
| |
|
LOL
Jun 22, 2009 9:27 PM | | ; |
when was your last title homie?
| |
|
Lazy
Jun 22, 2009 9:35 PM | | ; |
has the cutest players, so I say they win!
| |
|
RE: prediction...
Jun 23, 2009 0:18 AM | | ; |
Why 12? Our kicker hasn`t missed...
| |
|
re: prediction...
Jun 23, 2009 7:41 AM | | ; |
I know that you BIG dingleberry, he will get you 4 FG`s. You will not score any TD`s! Be Happy to even get points on the board.
| |
|
to re: haha
Jun 23, 2009 8:10 AM | | ; |
#69 from bulldogs..i think that was a insult to yourself..you were better off agreeing that you played with tnt..loser
| |
|
I have
Jun 23, 2009 9:51 AM | | ; |
a feeling that the lions can pull this off. I believe Diesel got beat by a C team last time we tried this game
| |
|
Lions
Jun 23, 2009 11:16 AM | | ; |
I agree. I think the Lions will be too much for Lazy to handle. Lazy is slow and old. The Lions are hungry.
| |
|
Maybe
Jun 23, 2009 11:53 AM | | ; |
Lazy shouldn`t go into this game thinking that the Lions are suspect. Remember what happened in the past A vs C game.
| |
|
baller
Jun 23, 2009 11:59 AM | | ; |
I got dem lions by 20 points.
| |
|
no way
Jun 23, 2009 12:11 PM | | ; |
As someone who has played both teams, the Lions have no shot. When my team was in C it was easy to feel like our champ could beat anyone. After spending many seasons in Open I know the difference is night and day. The Lions dont have the talent and dont have the experience to beat Lazy.
No. Shot.
| |
|
Lions
Jun 23, 2009 12:33 PM | | ; |
There is a reason they are called the Lions. They are the king of the jungle, they are going to shred Lazy, and then drop a load on Sef`s face.
| |
|
re: Maybe
Jun 23, 2009 3:05 PM | | ; |
The last A vs. C game was Diesel and TA. Diesel was like the 5th team choice and a HORRIBLE choice to represent A. I was in C at that time and even I thought that was a horrible representation for A league.
| |
|
He`s Baaack
Jun 23, 2009 3:31 PM | | ; |
How does my sack taste? I`ve been injured the past month, yet you can`t keep my name out of your mouth.
| |
|
re: prediction...
Jun 23, 2009 3:44 PM | | ; |
Well, only one way to shut you up and it isn`t gonna be done on the message boards. I suppose we will hear from you (but probably not...) after this coming Sunday.
| |
|
Diesel
Jun 23, 2009 4:02 PM | | ; |
was a top team that year - went undefeated through the reg season, including wins over lazy and CCR, played horrible in the heat against macdaddies; team split up after that game and i heard they only had like 1 starter play in the game
| |
|
Hell
Jun 23, 2009 4:03 PM | | ; |
Diesel weeknight would smoke the lions
| |
|
King of the jungle
Jun 23, 2009 5:53 PM | | ; |
Lions are going to bust a load in Sef`s face, then drop a duece on top of his head.
| |
|
WEAKNIGHT
Jun 23, 2009 6:47 PM | | ; |
Diesel, `nuff said. They can`t hang with Sunday league ANYMORE. That is why Andy had to regroup and wanted out of Sunday because competition is to tough. They went 3-6 in Open, not very impressive.
| |
|
Al Bundy The Truth coach |  |
Jun 23, 2009 6:56 PM | | ; |
They also won the B+ title.
| |
|
WEAKNIGHT
Jun 23, 2009 7:04 PM | | ; |
is right!!!!!They couldnt hang with the weekend teams
| |
|
Hate
Jun 23, 2009 7:37 PM | | ; |
all you want on Diesel but they are on the front page of the weeknight league.
| |
|
Re: WEAKNIGHT
Jun 23, 2009 7:46 PM | | ; |
So you`re saying that the competition is harder on Sunday? Badboys who are one of the top tier teams on Sunday went 5-4 in the weeknights. It`s a lot tougher then you think.
| |
|
The
Jun 23, 2009 8:28 PM | | ; |
WEAKNIGHTS have less teams = less competition. I bet BadBoys WEAKNIGHT team is not the same lineup as their Sunday team. The Deisel team in the past had some Triple Crown people on it. Those guys said no way in the Spring, hence Deisels 3-6 record. B+ title is nice but it is the consolation round for sub par teams, sad but true.
| |
|
re: Hate
Jun 23, 2009 8:44 PM | | ; |
I bet your team could be on the Front Page of the weaknight league too if you played in it! Acid Reign was 0-8 in Fall `08 and went 7-1-1 in WEAKNIGHT Spring 2009 and finished runner-up in their "B" tourney.
| |
|
Weeknight
Jun 23, 2009 9:43 PM | | ; |
league is just as tough as weakend league. I think the Mags or TC would run the table if they chose to play weakends this season. Diesel`s weeknight team would have easily won the open central this season
| |
|
WTF
Jun 24, 2009 8:15 AM | | ; |
Why is everyone getting worked up?! Lions are a good team. Lazy is a good AND experienced team. Lazy will be too much to handle for lions. There is a reason why lions started in c. They`re not good enough to compete with the big boys.
| |
|
Diesel
Jun 24, 2009 8:15 AM | | ; |
would have finished in the bottom of Open Central, East & West and lost in the first round of playoffs.
| |
|
Lions
Jun 24, 2009 10:44 AM | | ; |
being a first year team, it was probably smart for them to start in C rather than some of the other new teams that went straight into Open and got dusted off every week. Yeah there is no reason to get all worked up about this game because it means nothing. Lazy will handle them and I hope that the Lions take this game and learn from it.
| |
|
i can tell u this
Jun 24, 2009 10:09 PM | | ; |
Lions have won in the C league and the teams they played are very weak and makes them look like a legit team, but they dont` have any threat players to make them unbeatable. their defense is very weak, but if u expose their 3 mean rush. thats all they have offensively its only the QB that makes the play...
| |
|
lazy already got this
Jun 24, 2009 10:19 PM | | ; |
All you have to do is rush up the middle and cover the qb`s flats because he can throw on the run. they never go deep. defense is good but nothing special.
| |
|
With
Jun 24, 2009 10:45 PM | | ; |
all this talk about how to beat the C league Lions, you make it seem like this game actually matters. From reading a lot of these post, it looks like the Lions haven`t said anything. What does this mean? Are they nervous or do they even care at all? Come on Lions where you at?
| |
|
Lions don`t care?
Jun 25, 2009 7:55 AM | | ; |
The qb was asking for a scouting report lol
| |
|
SHould
Jun 25, 2009 1:32 PM | | ; |
LAZY lose they should be forced to give up their "A" status and be downgraded to "B" immediately.
| |
|
C League
Jun 25, 2009 5:39 PM | | ; |
C league should be getting behind the Lions. Maybe they don`t have the experience yet to have an excellent shot at taking down an A ranker, but it isn`t for lack of talent or drive. They went undefeated with a bare minimum of trash talking, almost perfectly polite to every team they came out on top over.
Its obvious they have the drive and talent to succeed, and they aren`t *******s like some of the teams, talking trash like crazy even with suspect records.
Wish them luck, even if they don`t win however, it`s exhibition for a reason. They aren`t going to A league yet, this is a learning experience.
| |
|
OK LIONS
Jun 25, 2009 6:25 PM | | ; |
since you made such a nice post about yourselves...good luck
| |
|
Rhinos92Locs
 registered poster
Jun 25, 2009 10:02 PM | | ; |
"Should LAZY lose they should be forced to give up their "A" status and be downgraded to "B" immediately."
Thats funny. I would imagine that if Lazy would lose you may see this occur on their sidelines:
On a serious note, Lions take this game as a good gauge to see how you fair against teams of this caliber and what you need to do to compete at the Open level.
REST IN PEACE MJ. WE LOVE YOU MICHAEL!!!!!
| |
|
omfg
Jun 25, 2009 10:17 PM | | ; |
That is freaking hillarious.
| |
|
What
Jun 25, 2009 10:39 PM | | ; |
team does that kid play for, we need a spaz like that for our D-LIne. I know he could get to anyones QB is seconds.
| |
|
Wow
Jun 25, 2009 11:01 PM | | ; |
That kid looks a lot like Mutiny`s QB!
| |
|
Actually
Jun 26, 2009 7:43 AM | | ; |
That kid is Locs, after his boy got jacked by the BBoys lineman! Loc`s has been crying like a little girl since then.
| |
|
R I P M J
Jun 26, 2009 8:47 AM | |
Actually
Jun 26, 2009 8:48 AM | | ; |
if u keep messing wit locs like that u will have omar hunting yo butt down n da streets! Locs is a Bmore brotha watch yo step homie!
| |
|
Player
Jun 28, 2009 1:28 PM | | ; |
Did he try and stick the remote up his ass? Hahahaha....
To MJ I say, "Just rest." He was pill popping pedophile who made great music in the `80s.
What was the Lazy vs. Lions score?
| |
|
good game
Jun 28, 2009 2:20 PM | | ; |
20-14 Lazy. It was a pretty good game. The game was tied at the half 7-7. The Lions took it down to the last few seconds but couldn`t convert
| |
|
disgrace
Jun 28, 2009 7:12 PM | | ; |
lazy is a disgrace with that performance. and they were lucky to win btw.
| |
|
?
Jun 28, 2009 8:02 PM | | ; |
why does Lazy have to be a disgrace? Maybe the Lions aren`t that bad.
| |
|
Player
Jun 28, 2009 8:06 PM | | ; |
You`re telling me that the Lions are as good as the team that made it to the A finals? I think Lazy could`ve given 2 ****s about today and the possible score is all the proof I need. But until the score is officially posted I will hold any further comments.
| |
|
!
Jun 28, 2009 10:29 PM | | ; |
I don`t know. Maybe both teams didn`t care about it. It didn`t count for anything but a good time. Maybe Lazy should be the ones to answer your questions or anything else you`re so curious about!
| |
|
Means nothing
Jun 29, 2009 9:49 AM | | ; |
These games are pointless and never reveal anything. First of all, there is not benefit for the A team in these match-ups. There is no up-side for them in any scenario. Either they win and nothing is determined, or they lose and everyone makes a big deal out of it. Secondly, I am sure the intensity is not the same on both sides - the A team is probably less than enthused and is not playing for anything, while the C team is playing in their Super Bowl. Lastly, the A team usually doesn`t have a strong team showing which makes the comparison even harder to make between the two teams.
When the Lions step up to B in the fall, they will get a better understanding of where they are. Until then, they could play DMob, the Wolves, Dietz, etc. until they are blue in the face and every game will be meaningless.
I am sure the Lions are an above avg team for the C level, but they will not know where they stand until this time next year.
| |
|
|