curious
May 11, 2008
1:27 PM | | ;
|
Who won the C-league games today?
|
| |
|
scores
May 11, 2008
1:32 PM | | | ; |
Midgets 41 Wolfpack 12
Hibachi 14 Psquad 7
Hibachi 19 USIS 7
TA 26 Prowlers 0
| |
|
typo?
May 11, 2008
2:05 PM | | | ; |
is that a typo with the Wolfpack game?
| |
|
to typo?
May 11, 2008
2:09 PM | | | ; |
No typo. Midgets won 41-12.
| |
|
i heard
May 11, 2008
2:09 PM | | | ; |
Mercy rule was in effect too..
| |
|
to i heard
May 11, 2008
2:12 PM | | | ; |
It was. No extra point after the touchdown to make it 41-12 or it would have been 42.
| |
|
Looks
May 11, 2008
2:16 PM | | | ; |
like the Midgets had something to prove after last weeks game.
| |
|
What happened...
May 11, 2008
2:25 PM | | | ; |
wow 41-12 Midgets over WP?
What happened during the PS, QH game?
| |
|
qh
May 11, 2008
2:26 PM | | | ; |
hibachi doing a great job of playing solid with their back to back games - shows they got plenty physical skills
| |
|
Game recap
May 11, 2008
2:56 PM | | | ; |
QH and PS game was pretty good. Our game/field got cancelled (BC2) for whatever reason so we stayed to watch the game. It was a close game and tied at halftime. All QH did was dump off in the middle or short dumpoffs to the outsides and they killed PS with that. PS had some missed flag pulls which caused a TD for QH. PS threw 2 picks and stopped the QH from scoring on the 5 yd line, which made QH go for the field goal, which they missed. PS had a chance to tie the game after a pass interference call but their line couldn`t match the speed of QH and gave up a sack. If they would`ve given PS`s qb like an extra second, they would have scored, considering he threw it and the tall receiver still caught in the endzone. All in all, it was a good game. PS def. doesn`t look like a 1-5 team, but they just can`t seem to get it done on Sundays and both they`re D and O look too inconsistent.
| |
|
game recap
May 11, 2008
3:04 PM | | | ; |
hey game recap - which game/field were you that got cancelled today? did it rain?
| |
|
props
May 11, 2008
3:14 PM | | | ; |
Gotta give QH`s qb props. His arm might be as limp as a 90 yr old great grandfather, but he makes quick decisions and moves the ball. Not sure why PS didn`t pick QH`s zone apart. They were playing 2 safeties and the slot recievers were wide open.
| |
|
QH and PS game
May 11, 2008
3:27 PM | | | ; |
QH had in their back up Qb against Psquad. It was a good game though. To answer above, all games on BC #2 were canceled (well at least the first two) but BC #1 played.
| |
|
why
May 11, 2008
3:42 PM | | | ; |
anyone know why BC2 was cancelled? the two fields, BC1 and BC2, looked to be in the same condition?
| |
|
Because
May 11, 2008
4:15 PM | | | ; |
they weren`t in the same condition. BC2 was a lot more saturated than 1. It sits lower than BC1.
| |
|
Practice Squad
asst coach | 
|
May 11, 2008
6:08 PM | | | ; |
Yeah. One second more would`ve done it. I blew it.
| |
|
ha
May 11, 2008
6:42 PM | | | ; |
wow wolfpack sucks just like I thought. Guess they can stop crying about everyone "sleepin" on them. yo.
| |
|
hahaha
May 11, 2008
7:33 PM | | | ; |
looks like desktop will have to wait alil longer to score a point! QH getting it done with the double header, impressive wins. Thank you midgets now we won`t have to see sorry*****wolfpack on the messageboard anymore, silenced the puppy pack, and TA with another shutout, against a not so good prowlers, anyone see that game?
| |
|
recap
May 11, 2008
10:03 PM | | | ; |
not sure if this is the more active post or the other one - but can someone give a recap of the QH-USIS game and the Wolfpack-Midgets game? Thanks!
| |
|
Recap
May 12, 2008
7:38 AM | | | ; |
QH was just a more faster team than USIS.
| |
|
summary
May 12, 2008
9:34 AM | | | ; |
midgets scored on 1st drive. wp scored on their 1st drive, missed kick. midgets scored, a lot.wp scored and went for 2, missed the conversion.midgets scored, more. mercy rule, game over.
| |
|
hahah
May 12, 2008
9:41 AM | | | ; |
"midgets scored, a lot."
AHAHAHA. Like I said, WP has had the benefit of 2 easy games against the Prowlers and Desktop and a SUPER lucky win over QH, but I know it`s not their fault as the league makes the schedule. It`s just funny how they really got over confident and came back with some witty comments and blah blah. I guess this weekend was a BIG reality check for them.
| |
|
its ok
May 12, 2008
9:49 AM | | | ; |
its ok, cus teams are still "sleeping" on them...hahaha
| |
|
ok
May 12, 2008
9:52 AM | | | ; |
now we know why they were doing half decent. the two bottom teams....WP IS GARBAGE
| |
|
:(
May 12, 2008
10:43 AM | | | ; |
we haven`t heard from WP yet and i don`t think we`ll be hearing anything for a looonnggg time.
poor lil puppies.
| |
|
ha
May 12, 2008
10:47 AM | | | ; |
they dropped out of the league
| |
|
whoa whoa whoa
May 12, 2008
11:09 AM | | | ; |
I just checked the scores for this weekend`s games - 41 points against wolfpack?? what happened? were they missing half their team or something? I thought wolfpack was a good team cuz they had a close game with Chuck Norris earlier this season (7-0 loss I beleive). What happened? Highlights please?
| |
|
to whoa
May 12, 2008
11:21 AM | | | ; |
the CN and WP game was close cus CN has been averaging 7 points this season (not a knock on CN) and CN just shut them out. The QH game was won by one point off of a lucky pick in QH`s redzone. Like everyone`s been saying, they shouldn`t have been on that high horse for beating desktop and the prowlers.
Are they back to their old ways of fighting amongst eachother?
| |
|
umm
May 12, 2008
11:22 AM | | | ; |
im pretty sure the "highlights" are 7 posts up ^^....and no, they just suck, badly.midgets qb was playing corner cus they had no people..thats how bad they are.
| |
|
and yes
May 12, 2008
11:23 AM | | | ; |
they were fighting eachother the entire 2nd half of the game like little girls.
| |
|
Speedy Gonzales
May 12, 2008
11:52 AM | | | ; |
QH was just too fast yesterday for both their opponents yesterday. If they bring the same speed & intensity against CN, it will be a great game.
| |
|
Recappo
May 12, 2008
12:06 PM | | | ; |
It`s not that QH is faster, it`s that they just pitch the ball non-stop. It will work for a while, but not against the best teams in the league. And definitely not in the more competitive leagues.
| |
|
hmm
May 12, 2008
12:11 PM | | | ; |
i dont remember them being fast as all they did were dumpoffs and screens all game. theyre dline is pretty fast but i wonder how they`d fair with the midgets oline, cus those are some big*****people.
| |
|
They
May 12, 2008
12:14 PM | | | ; |
play 2 deep safeties and rush 3 every down, the middle deep is open every play. USIS scored on a long one down the middle, had another big pass down the middle, and had a defensive PI call down the middle. Midgets `go up and get it` guys will kill it.
| |
|
but
May 12, 2008
12:19 PM | | | ; |
where were these "go up and get it" guys against CN? 6 and 41 is a big difference.
| |
|
Couldn`t tell you
May 12, 2008
12:22 PM | | | ; |
Ive seen the Midgets in two games. In both games the majority of their offense was long pass plays on the outside where it was 1v1 and the WR got the ball. The other plays were deep down the middle.
I do know that QH has 1 player taller than 5`6. I also know QH`s middle opens up when they play 5 in coverage with 2 safeties over the top. But, theyll occasionally play 2 underneath, 3 deep, then it`s a show.
| |
|
ya
May 12, 2008
12:29 PM | | | ; |
The qb isn`t bigger than 5`5, and is quick but they are limited because they cannot consistently stretch the field, and have to rely on the dump off`s and short passes. If teams contain the flats and get in his face, they should have a field day.
| |
|
I think...
May 12, 2008
12:34 PM | | | ; |
the Midgets have been the most inconsistant team so far. Loose a close one to CN (6 pts)and then blow out WP (41 pts). I think people over look the fact that even though CN`s O doesn`t put up a lot of points and their D (Fireman) get a lot attention, they manage the game real well and don`t make mistakes. WP`s not a bad team, they were just overmatched yesterday. The rest of the season should be interesting.
| |
|
Facts
May 12, 2008
12:46 PM | | | ; |
The QH QB during yesterday`s double header is their back up. He did an excellent job managing the game and ended up with 2 Ws. The starting QB has a gun for an arm and opens up the field. QH was also missing 5 starters. Their D is allowing an avg of 7pts per game...pretty good for those slow small players
| |
|
umm
May 12, 2008
1:06 PM | | | ; |
WP is NOT GOOD. what is everyones fascination with that team? any team out besides two, can beat them. midgets are inconsistant maybe because they have the least amount of people that show up to every game and are playing both sides of the ball. fireman?? 72 or w/e his number is from the midgets tossed him around like he was a f*cking puppy, dont hype that guy up like hes a god. cn, mgts, qh, ta, PS, any of those teams could, already have, or will smack wp up.
| |
|
hey tough guy
May 12, 2008
1:12 PM | | | ; |
Fireman pretty much leads the league in sacks, so even if 1 guy "tossed him around" i`m pretty sure he still leads the league in sacks.
you obviously play for the little girly midgets and ur just trying to hype up ur boy. can that big goof catch a pass and run 10 yards without falling? not many can play oline, dline and skill positions.
| |
|
tough guy?
May 12, 2008
1:17 PM | | | ; |
im not saying hes not good, he is. I dont understand why people just sh!t when they talk about him like he owns the league...i watched the fu*king game at bc and saw it happening. there you go, hypin him up again, your obviously one of his little bi*ch groupies.
| |
|
really
May 12, 2008
1:21 PM | | | ; |
ok, so we have officially established that if someone says something positive about a team, they automatically play for them...al bundy over here says good **** bout other teams all the time so both you guys are retarted.
| |
|
really really?
May 12, 2008
1:22 PM | |
If
May 12, 2008
1:23 PM | | | ; |
It seems as if the league is culturally accurate. USIS, Midgets, WTF, all play with 8-12 players. While QH, the asian team, plays with 18 players on their squad.
| |
|
HAHAHA
May 12, 2008
1:29 PM | | | ; |
Where is the mexican team with 20+ players.
| |
|
really really really
May 12, 2008
1:31 PM | |
is it true CN
May 12, 2008
1:34 PM | |
Here come
May 12, 2008
1:47 PM | | | ; |
the racial sterotypes on a flag football board...right on the dot
| |
|
Nah
May 12, 2008
1:51 PM | | | ; |
Simple geographic and census observations.
| |
|
HAHAHA
May 12, 2008
1:53 PM | | | ; |
HAHAHAHAHAHA BEST RESPONSE EVER
| |
|
2
May 12, 2008
1:55 PM | | | ; |
yes CN rushes 2 and they still manage to get pressure. wonder how they give up only 4 points per game? try completing passes with 6 in coverage + a pass rush.
| |
|
Hahaha
May 12, 2008
1:55 PM | | | ; |
Damn I guess it is true what they say about asians they are smart and they always manage to find a good deal.. All those fresh legs and cost of registration is cheap.
Wow why didn`t i think of that?
| |
|
stop
May 12, 2008
1:58 PM | | | ; |
talking about serious matters, we are having a great discussion right now.
| |
|
i`d have to
May 12, 2008
2:00 PM | | | ; |
see that to believe it works
| |
|
FIREMAN
Chuck Norris | 
|
May 12, 2008
2:06 PM | | | ; |
Damn if you read I actually acknowledged the fact that #77 was a load, and i dont normally play O-Line. That big mofo out weighed me by 80lbs or so, but the main thing is we came out on top.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Practice Squad #72
May 12, 2008
2:06 PM | | | ; |
We moved the ball fairly well against CN (and were the first team to score on them, and have the most points against them), and blocked their pass rush effectively.
Two reasons why it worked for us. The first is an extremely mobile QB, who can also throw the ball. Very hard to ignore either aspect of his game. The second was the spread offense. Probably the first time they had seen it this year.
What CN does have though, is one of the best flag pulling units in the league. If you can pull flags well, that translates into wins. We couldn`t do it against them. We never got off the field defensively.
| |
|
DFA
Chuck Norris #21
May 12, 2008
2:09 PM | |
FIREMAN
Chuck Norris |
|
May 12, 2008
2:09 PM | | | ; |
...and yes it is very true we only rush 2 and drop 6. Been like that every game thus far and it works, but only if you have the personel up front to do it, and if you dont beleive it ask the teams that have played us or come out and watch and take notes.
| |
|
CN pass rush
May 12, 2008
2:14 PM | | | ; |
They do only rush 2 and they play with 2 safeties. I`m telling you, while their D line is good the way they manage the game in more impressive. They are ok with taking their time and punting. No turn overs or penalties or missed PATs. They trust that their D can get it back for them. You don`t win this many 1-2 pt. games if you make mistakes. If you only get the ball 4 times durring the game you damn well better make it count. Teams haven`t done that yet. Case in point, WP in red zone 3 times. Couldn`t get it done. Midgets, missed PAT. PS, missed PAT early. Tried for 2, didn`t get it.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Practice Squad #72
May 12, 2008
2:15 PM | | | ; |
Oh yeah, they also have a beast of a TE. Thanks for the reminder ;)
| |
|
Enough about CN,
May 12, 2008
2:20 PM | | | ; |
lets get back to real issue at hand. WP got beat 41-12. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
| |
|
WP 16
May 12, 2008
2:21 PM | | | ; |
Did he get ejected? If not..then that`s a great moral victory for them
| |
|
observer
May 12, 2008
2:29 PM | | | ; |
was watching the game from the WP sideline - they were all saying WP 16 was their best player other than WP 55. WP 55 got a handoff early in the game and ran for 10-12 yards and that was it. Didnt touch the ball after that. As far as WP 16, who was supposedly their best player according to the WP cheerleaders - he ended up with 0 catches - the defense smothered both WP 16 and WP 55
| |
|
rush 2 against TA
May 12, 2008
2:31 PM | | | ; |
and you will lose, fo sho.
| |
|
cant wait
May 12, 2008
2:33 PM | | | ; |
to watch TA get worked when they ACTUALLY play someone good.
| |
|
DFA
Chuck Norris #21
May 12, 2008
2:33 PM | | | ; |
haha says who? TA usually logs in...
| |
|
played against them...
May 12, 2008
2:34 PM | |
DFA
Chuck Norris #21
May 12, 2008
2:36 PM | | | ; |
Well don`t worry, we won`t be changing our defensive philosophy for any 1 team. We can make in-game adjustments as needed though.
| |
|
WP
May 12, 2008
2:41 PM | | | ; |
yea that WP dude who supposedly got ejected last game - he was quiet in yesterday`s game - either the D was really good or he`s overrated
| |
|
which guy
May 12, 2008
4:33 PM | |
The Guy
May 12, 2008
4:35 PM | |
u talking about
May 12, 2008
4:39 PM | | | ; |
the cracked out she-male prostitute lookin guy?
| |
|
to which guy
May 12, 2008
4:39 PM | |
Probably
May 12, 2008
4:48 PM | | | ; |
the guy throwing elbows and cursing his own teammates
| |
|
his
May 12, 2008
4:49 PM | | | ; |
mouth didnt open the entire game.
| |
|
Lumpy
May 12, 2008
4:57 PM | | | ; |
You goofballs should do like talking about your crappy game ALL day. Big deal, Midgets beat WP. Yeahhhh Midgets, boooo WP. Move on.
| |
|
uh Lumpy..
May 12, 2008
5:29 PM | |
yea lumpy
May 13, 2008
1:02 PM | | | ; |
learn how to write...and ur WP team is oveeeerated
| |
|
41-12
May 15, 2008
4:41 PM | | | ; |
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
| |
|
6?
May 16, 2008
7:44 AM | | | ; |
ok midgets stop hyping yourselves up anonymously. where were you the week before when CN stonewalled your*****7-6? 6 points out of that high powered offense.
| |
|
May 16, 2008
9:33 AM | | | ; |
We won and we moved on. I think this thread should be deleted anyway. I hope/ don`t think that any of our guys would continue to dwell on the WP game. But hey, you never know. We need to focus on keeping that same level of play from here on out. I think we are.
| |
|
|