Mongo
Oct 29, 2007
5:08 PM | | ;
|
What are the predictions out there, here are mine.
Hokies will win a close game against an underrated wolf pack squad (13-8)
Ntac will defeat the penetrators in a defensive battle (17-10)
best of luck to all playing in those games
|
| |
|
Numero dos
Oct 29, 2007
6:50 PM | | | ; |
I believe Hokies will win but it will be close, if the wolf pack can put some points they could stun everyone with a victory. I`m taking the Hokies 16-10
I`m playing in the other
| |
|
WP TO
Oct 29, 2007
7:30 PM | | | ; |
Dear Media,
I will not be answering any question concerning this Sunday`s matchup between us and the Hokies til after the game. However I will say one thing. It`s gon` be a fight. We beat`em in last years Turkeybowl and they beat us in week 3. So all of ya`ll, gitcha popcorn ready! It`s gon` be a hot in a cold town on Sunday mornin`! Yee Hawwww !!
| |
|
MRS. OBSERVER II
Oct 29, 2007
7:37 PM | | | ; |
Well, sorry for the delay but I was unable to post for a while. I think that if someone were to post who would win the C division now, you would get a totaly different outlook. What do you think????? Just remember what I stated in past threads! So, what do you think......Hookies vs. NTAC.....????
| |
|
funny
Oct 29, 2007
9:42 PM | | | ; |
Funny how wolfpack always brings up that they beat the Hokies in a turkeybowl last year, talk bout living in the past. we all know if the hokies had their starting qb, it wouldn`t even be close.
| |
|
wolfpack
Oct 29, 2007
10:25 PM | | | ; |
Funny how everyone is so annonymous now after teams are losing and playoffs almost done, must be the losing team talkn, i could be wrong. who cares about a stupid turkeybowl, this is the c league playoffs. and to MR. "Funny", we`d rather play against their starting qb not without.
| |
|
I think
Oct 29, 2007
11:27 PM | | | ; |
WP TO is right, its gonna be a fight...they will get down and either try to fight the hokies or fight with each other
| |
|
livin in the past
Oct 30, 2007
1:14 AM | | | ; |
we aint livin in the past about nothin. we livin in the present. all i know is this is a budding rivalry with the hokies. and i agree with WP TO. lets get out the popcorn, cause its going to be a battle.
| |
|
Norris fan
Oct 30, 2007
4:02 PM | | | ; |
how is it a rivalry when yall got squashed, sounds like it`s a rivaly in yall`s eyes
| |
|
hmmm
Oct 30, 2007
4:05 PM | | | ; |
And what will Chuck Norris do after this season? Attempt the C again?
| |
|
And You Know This
Oct 30, 2007
4:14 PM | | | ; |
He`s back! The kat you love to hate! Here`s my predictions:
NTAC 10 Penetrators 21 (returning the week 2 favor)
Hokies 21 Wolfpack 28 (returning the week 3 favor)
WP vs. Penetrators in the finals!
Best of luck to all of you!
| |
|
c league balla
Oct 30, 2007
4:52 PM | | | ; |
I really like your prediction except I think it will be a closer game b/t Pen and NTAC. Pen will close the game. Hokies and WP will be a defensive game and may come down to who scores first. WP cant kick PAT`s or FG`s to save their lives.
WIN OR GO HOME!
| |
|
And You Know This
Oct 30, 2007
5:08 PM | | | ; |
I`m taking back my past score prediction to post:
NTAC 13 Pentrators 21
Hokies 14 Wolfpack 21
Both games will both boil down to who wants it the most and the difference will be a one score loss! C League Balla.......I`ma steal your slogan:
WIN OR GO HOME! LMAO
| |
|
P-nut budda and jelley
Oct 30, 2007
5:18 PM | | | ; |
Here is how its gonna go down
NTAC will win a close game 20-17 on a late field goal and the penetrators offense won`t be able to go the length of the field to try and tie it up.
Hokies will take it to the wolf pack this sunday 20-6. WP has no offense and the three play hokies will dominate
Championship will be a rematch NTAC vs HOKIES(hokies won first battle 28-0)
| |
|
WP
Oct 30, 2007
7:31 PM | | | ; |
its a budding rivalry because we know them, that`s all. btw Chuck, how`s it feel to lose season after season to younger and more talented teams?
| |
|
c league balla
Oct 31, 2007
9:53 AM | | | ; |
and you know this, what team do you play on again? you havent been here in a minute.
| |
|
damn
Oct 31, 2007
2:10 PM | | | ; |
kick a team while they`re down. Chuck doesnt talk schmack on here so why pick on them? I can remember not too long ago when the rookie WP was struggling to get a win. hehehhohohohahahah
| |
|
its the internet
Oct 31, 2007
2:18 PM | | | ; |
everyone posting anonymously who knows if they are talking or not, they have same % as any other team to be spitting racist garbage out earlier.
| |
|
WolfPack
Oct 31, 2007
4:59 PM | | | ; |
yeah that was a low blow. Im ashamed of who ever posted that
| |
|
The Truth Hurts!
Oct 31, 2007
5:18 PM | | | ; |
A monk was walking down a dirt road with another fellow monk. A nice looking woman crossed their paths and began heading the same direction. All 3 came to a stream, and 1 of the monks picked the woman up and helped her across the stream. One monk said to the other monk "you know we are not to have phyical contact with women, why did you do it"! He replied. "Sometimes in life people do sh#t they are not suppose to" then they continued walking. He brought it back up again..."why did you do that". The other monk finally said "dude i left the woman at the stream. Why are YOU still carrying her"!
| |
|
Re:Truth
Oct 31, 2007
5:35 PM | | | ; |
Moral of the story. Guys I know someone who is very ignorant posted that comment! But can we move on....Lets not focus on these people we are giving way too much thought to this stupidity....Stop Carrying it! Lets talk football. Thats the purpose of the messageboard.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 31, 2007
10:25 PM | |
And You Know This
Nov 03, 2007
11:35 AM | | | ; |
Sunday is almsot here! I can`t wait to see the outcome! Will my predictions be off? or on the money! Stay tuned ladies! lol
| |
|
itttsss timmmme
Nov 04, 2007
3:28 AM | | | ; |
...and you know this, you will miss both predictions, all your predictions have been whack lately
| |
|
No! Whats "whacked"
Nov 04, 2007
7:27 AM | | | ; |
Is you posting at this time of day or night?
tttsss timmmme
Today
03:28 AM
| |
|
And You Know This
Nov 04, 2007
8:15 AM | | | ; |
Please prove me wrong! These teams have bounced back after loses. We`ll see who`s right! Good luck 2 all......
| |
|
And you know nothing..
Nov 04, 2007
12:52 PM | | | ; |
Games over...Very decisive wins by NTAC and Hokies...Slaughter rule in the NTAC game
| |
|
Pen#1
Nov 04, 2007
2:23 PM | | | ; |
We got it handed to us today, simple as that...the two team that beat us exploited the one serious weakness in our defense...it should be a good game between NTAC and Hokies...BOTH teams play the same way using the legs of their QB...Good Luck!
| |
|
hmm
Nov 04, 2007
3:05 PM | | | ; |
what was the score of the hokies wp game?
| |
|
Hokies #14
Nov 04, 2007
3:19 PM | |
hmm
Nov 04, 2007
3:35 PM | | | ; |
wow didnt know it would be that high of a score. Good job hokies. Guess you guys bounced back with out your starting qb. Better luck next year wp.
| |
|
the hokies
Nov 04, 2007
3:45 PM | | | ; |
had their starting qb for the first half. he threw 3 td passes, 2 long ones which were really sweet. he then re-injured his knee
| |
|
WP#21
Nov 04, 2007
4:26 PM | | | ; |
sigh .. good game Hokies .. yall really took it to us .. we had some momentum with 11 minutes left on yall .. but hey .. score says it all
| |
|
Woodshed
Nov 04, 2007
6:42 PM | | | ; |
I don`t know how much momentum you can have if you were down 28-0 and then losing the game 35-14. It wasn`t even a game. Once again Wolfpack talks all week, loses the game on sunday.
| |
|
yup
Nov 04, 2007
6:44 PM | | | ; |
woulda been a better game is the hokies had play chuck instead. =P
| |
|
WP#21
Nov 04, 2007
7:51 PM | | | ; |
whoever you were Woodshed .. but yea your right .. it was 28-0 .. and then we scored 2 TDs to make it 28-14 .. and at that point we had some bad breaks .. Hokies ran out alot of the clock .. but why am i even explaining myself to you ? dont even know who you are .. but your right .. we`re all talk .. and if you wanna be technical about it .. since we TALK all the time like you said .. and we lose the games every sunday .. how is it we made it this far ? yea okay .. i was giving my respect to the Hokies cuz they won .. im not denying a damn thing .. but you gotta go and attack me for givin them some respect .. your so cool
| |
|
Chuck Norris Fan
Nov 04, 2007
8:01 PM | | | ; |
Beating the 7 man CN team is probably the biggest reason you guys got that far. Wolfpack too much talk, next year keep it quiet till you guys win something please!
| |
|
WP
Nov 04, 2007
8:39 PM | | | ; |
you all just always have something to say, and always have to have the last word...even after you lose...no one wants an explanation, just resign to the loss and leave it at that
| |
|
hey chuck
Nov 04, 2007
8:47 PM | | | ; |
It would`ve been a better game if the hokies played chuck instead of wolfpack, it`d probably be a real nice shutout, something along the lines of 42-0. Have fun fighting to stay out of the bottom spot in C league next year again.
| |
|
sideline observer
Nov 04, 2007
10:06 PM | | | ; |
man now with the wp eliminated what am i suppose to read about at work tomorrow morning. I was rooting for you guys to win so i can read all the smack talk for the rest of the week. oh wel good luck hokies and ntac
| |
|
Observer of C
Nov 04, 2007
11:01 PM | | | ; |
Wolfpack they always do seem to make excuses when they lose. They don`t learn from the mistakes they just keep on thinking they lost because of luck but in reality its because they are not a good team. They will always be just the middle tier of a C league till they clean up the act.
| |
|
And You Know This
Nov 05, 2007
0:06 AM | | | ; |
I personally think NTAC is a lucky team....I don`t know what Penetrators team showed up...but it wasn`t the Penetrators that played last week. As for the Hokies.....they definitely did their thang......Good games this past Sunday!
| |
|
WP#21
Nov 05, 2007
3:25 AM | | | ; |
ey yall can talk all you want .. and Chuck fans .. i dont kno if you on the team or what .. like i said before .. it aint our fault Chuck didnt come with their squad .. what do u want us to do ? why am i even talkin about the Chuck game ? we beat them when they had a full squad .. so what were you expecting Chuck Norris fan ? and we dont make excuses when we lose .. we give the other teams we play our respct .. and if you sayin all that .. you obviously arent on those teams .. i guess its okay though .. using this msgboard as a place to talk **** bout us and hide instead of sayin it to our faces
| |
|
NTAC
Nov 05, 2007
9:56 AM | | | ; |
how bout givin NTAC a little credit, we swept the penetrators this season. And shut them out in the playoffs, no offense to them they played real hard all game, but hey when our team shows up to play we can compete with anyone.
| |
|
To Wp 21
Nov 05, 2007
10:16 AM | | | ; |
Your season is over so STFU. Good lord. Find a new sport.
| |
|
To WP21
Nov 05, 2007
10:26 AM | |
The NTAC Truth
Nov 05, 2007
11:00 AM | | | ; |
If teams want to call us lucky for making it to the championship thats fine! We dont need credit, merit, or respect; unless given. We congradulate all teams for a competitive season, and hope the best for you all in the future! We will never post comments out of arrogance or criticism. We came to play hard and have fun! Thanks again for a fun 2007 season chuck, demons, hokies, penetrators, p.squad, wolf pack, and auld shebeen!
| |
|
and u know this
Nov 05, 2007
12:16 PM | | | ; |
should shut the **** up and stop talkin **** cause your predictions were wrong u ****in *****
| |
|
what?!?!?
Nov 05, 2007
12:19 PM | | | ; |
i didnt know semi finialist get a trophy. I saw the pic of wp and a trophy/
| |
|
you know what that means!
Nov 05, 2007
12:20 PM | | | ; |
Its go up on one of those guys myspace!!!
| |
|
Good Lord
Nov 05, 2007
12:21 PM | | | ; |
Take it easy... you C leaguers are so angry. Yall need to relax... Let your game speak for itself and stop talking about yourself..
| |
|
NTAC #3
Nov 05, 2007
2:14 PM | | | ; |
If we win or not that trophy is gonna be my new facebook picture...me butt naked, and the trophy in all its glory. aHA! Good game Penetrators.
| |
|
|