C League Network
Sep 30, 2007
8:12 PM | | ;
|
Put who you think is the best at certain positions:
QB:
RB:
WR:
TE:
OL:
DL:
CB:
LB:
S:
Put either an individual player or a teams overall.
This should be interesting. HAVE FUN!
|
| |
|
C League Network
Sep 30, 2007
8:13 PM | |
And You Know This!
Sep 30, 2007
8:21 PM | | | ; |
Penetrators O-line, D-line, QB & Receivers, Wolfpack Safeties & #16. Nuff Said. Hokies QB. None of these teams have a consistent Kicker.
| |
|
Stats
Sep 30, 2007
8:51 PM | | | ; |
Well the stats speak for themself. Looks like the Penetrators have the best Defense so far and the Hokies have the best offense. If the Penetrators lock down that offense, this is going to be the game to watch.
| |
|
To Stats
Sep 30, 2007
9:56 PM | | | ; |
penetrators locking down the hokies....what drug is it that you are on?
| |
|
Al Bundy
Sep 30, 2007
11:38 PM | | | ; |
Are you serious with the Penetrators O-line and D-line? I`m not trying to talk sh*t or anything, but we owned those guys at the line today. Owned them.
| |
|
Right!
Sep 30, 2007
11:57 PM | | | ; |
The statistics speak....Hokies have the best Offense so far with 127 PF while the Penetrators have the Defense so far with 39 PA. I copy/pasted for you.
# team W L T PF PA AvPD perc
1 Hokies 4 0 0 127 39 +22.0 1.000
2 The Penetrators 3 1 0 89 30 +14.7 0.750
Since when does getting shutout by a team mean you "owned" them?
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 01, 2007
0:55 AM | | | ; |
We didn`t get shut out. And as far as owning the team, no. They beat us. But we destroyed their line. Their O-line never gave their QB more than 3 seconds and they very rarely got anywhere close to our QB. Points For and Points Against don`t tell the whole story sweetheart.
| |
|
Hmmm
Oct 01, 2007
8:26 AM | | | ; |
When you are up by 25 points at the two minute warning in the second half and the referee calls the game, that`s called being shut out.
| |
|
Ha Ha
Oct 01, 2007
8:30 AM | | | ; |
I have to agree. With 127 points against, I`d have to say you haven`t owned anyone. That`s twice as many as the Demons!
Practice Squad 0 4 0 52 127 -18.7 0.000
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 01, 2007
8:59 AM | | | ; |
I`ll agree, just looking at the numbers doesn`t look good. BUT, I`m not talking about the defense OR offense as a whole. I`m talking about the line, and more importantly, the idea that The Penetrators have one of the best. I missed the previous 2 weeks, but I heard the Demons line was solid. But as a line, we rolled over the Penetrators line. I don`t want to take anything away from them, they played awesome and have some great playmakers, but it`s not their line that`s winning them games. And seriously, what are you talking about? We played the entire game against the Penetrators to the best of my knowledge and we scored, so that`s not a shutout.
| |
|
viewer
Oct 01, 2007
9:02 AM | | | ; |
who are the best "C" league players? detailed.
| |
|
Entire Game
Oct 01, 2007
9:08 AM | | | ; |
The ref called the game with over 1:30 left after the Penetrators returned a pick for a touchdown.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 01, 2007
9:34 AM | | | ; |
My fault. I didn`t know there was time left on the clock. Either way, I don`t believe that you can say they outplayed us on the line. Maybe everywhere else, and these guys are a good team, but they don`t have a great line on either side of the ball.
| |
|
O-line
Oct 01, 2007
9:38 AM | | | ; |
Demons O-line is solid. Hokies QB. Agreed as far as kickers, haven`t seen any really stand out. The C-division is a toss up on who wins. Just have to wait and see come playoff time. Good job too all the teams that won this weekend
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 01, 2007
9:54 AM | | | ; |
Demons have the best D-line. The closest team would be practice squad. Penetrators have a sick QB not a good O-Line, he releases the ball quickly and has great throwing angles.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 01, 2007
10:00 AM | | | ; |
Agreed. The Penetrators QB is the best passer I`ve seen in the C league. Hokies QB may be an awesome scrambler, but that guy flat out can throw.
| |
|
Penetrators
Oct 01, 2007
10:26 AM | | | ; |
only have 30 points against b/c they havent played the hokies yet. the hokies drop 32 a game.
| |
|
Hmmm
Oct 01, 2007
10:46 AM | | | ; |
The Penetrators O-Line were out to 6AM partying on Saturday...sorry we didn`t perform to your expectations...victory is still victory...but you guys had a mad rush. Props...
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 01, 2007
10:49 AM | | | ; |
Seriously, I`m not trying to bash you guys, you outplayed us and won. I just found it silly that people were saying you had the best line because of statistics that didn`t show anything about the line.
Appreciate the props, and I think you guys have a bunch of talent. Here`s to hopefully seeing you in the playoffs.
| |
|
??
Oct 01, 2007
10:52 AM | | | ; |
what team in the C league would be known as the "sleeper" and "Overrated"?
| |
|
pack #3
Oct 01, 2007
11:17 AM | | | ; |
haha all these posts are in monday morning. is wut yall think of on monday mornings? I do!!
| |
|
Hmmm
Oct 01, 2007
11:18 AM | | | ; |
Tough one. Demons as a sleeper maybe. Auld Shebeen maybe Penetrators too. Overrated, umm maybe the Hokies. Tough call actually. I think the QB for Penetrators as well, he gets rid of the damn ball quick
| |
|
mNyce
Oct 01, 2007
1:34 PM | | | ; |
Hokies saftey is real nice, hes got some wheels. The guy on auld shebeen usually lines up in the backfield and catches a lot in the flats, he could be the best offensive player. 2 recivers on NTAC are money, they have a good kicker as well. Penetrators, Hokies and NTAC all have good QB`s, with the hokies probably coming in third there just because that guy has a seriously limp arm, but I guess thats not why they are using him. It`s tough to tell who`s winning on the line play...I`ve seen pretty much every quarterback running for their life on every play.
| |
|
???
Oct 01, 2007
1:35 PM | | | ; |
Yeah, thats a tough one. I don`t think Penetrators can be considered a sleeper because their already considered one of the best teams in the league. Um.. maybe WP. They have speed and talent, they just need to bring some things together.
The only team that can even be considered overrated are the Hokies. I guess time will tell how things play out.
| |
|
?????
Oct 01, 2007
2:10 PM | | | ; |
how are the hokies overated? no one has come 20 points close to beating them
| |
|
??????
Oct 01, 2007
3:31 PM | | | ; |
that is cuz the hokies havent seen the mighty penetrators
| |
|
Diamonds are Forever
Oct 01, 2007
3:35 PM | | | ; |
That`s because the Hokies haven`t played the Demons. We would have blown the Wolfpack out if we`d had our starting QB in. They had two fluke plays on us where they scored long TDs. Demon domination is about to be in full effect. I wish we had the Hokies this week, but I guess a warm-up game against Auld Shebeen could give us more time to work out the kinks.
| |
|
penetrators
Oct 01, 2007
3:35 PM | | | ; |
penetrators went 1-6 last season. i wonder how good the hokies would be if they played another season in C
http://fall.iffl.us/teams?=1035=90
| |
|
WP#16
Oct 01, 2007
3:44 PM | | | ; |
haha man where is the respect...
| |
|
yuuup
Oct 01, 2007
3:48 PM | | | ; |
"Demon domination is about to be in full effect"
HAHAHAHA
| |
|
Lol
Oct 01, 2007
4:04 PM | | | ; |
You guys won, we arent taking that away from you, but damn that was a floop doop pass you got to admit that lol, and a 30 yard penalty doesnt help the situation at all, geesh
| |
|
soon
Oct 01, 2007
4:16 PM | | | ; |
hokies better get ready for a real team
| |
|
Shebeen
Oct 01, 2007
4:17 PM | | | ; |
warm up game? how does a 1-3 team talk smack? kind of like NTAC forfeiting a game, then thinking they had some kind of right to stick around for the game after theirs and talk smack. some people in this league are just morons...
| |
|
Shebeen
Oct 01, 2007
4:27 PM | | | ; |
Also, here`s the best players I`ve seen in C League so far. Keep in mind we haven`t seen Demons, Penetrators or Chuck Norris.
NTAC Wide Receiver #80 (Coles Jersey, killed us)
Hokies QB #7 (very quick, gave us alot of trouble)
| |
|
Joker
Oct 01, 2007
4:32 PM | | | ; |
Demons need to grow up! They couldn’t win a game last year. After a 0-2 start they “upgraded” their team and won ONE game and started talking smack about how they are going to walk all over the rest of the C league and get into the open league. hahaha. Their record is 1-3.Now Diamond is saying Auld Shebeen is going to be a warm up?
| |
|
55 Wp
Oct 01, 2007
5:25 PM | | | ; |
We didnt beat the demons they beat themselves....damn masterbaters. Stop talkin trash please, we moved the chains on yall all day...wasnt supposed to be that close of a game.
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 01, 2007
5:54 PM | | | ; |
Wolfpack you guys are terrible. We had more penalty yards then you had offense. 55 you look like chunk from the goonies...
| |
|
Diamonds are Forever
Oct 01, 2007
5:58 PM | | | ; |
Thanks for your honesty, 55. I will not, however, stop talking trash. You didn`t move the chains on us. It was literally two plays. You`re right when you say it wasn`t supposed to be that close of a game. The inferior team won, which does happen sometimes.
| |
|
hmmm
Oct 01, 2007
6:10 PM | | | ; |
hmm a win is a win...but homeboy on wp did burn you guys off of a dump off pass he ran like what 50 yards without a defender in site. anyways looks like good rivalry is heating up.
| |
|
Joker
Oct 01, 2007
6:39 PM | | | ; |
Fatman and Diamond need a hug from this league. You guys love to make excuses after a defeat. That`s nice. Grow the F@$$ up! Both of your TD was pure luck! That first TD could have been intercepted if the safety didn’t jump too early. Second TD was basically a hail mary that went pass one of your WR and into the hand of the WR behind him. Luck? And o yeah, who’s that big sashquash that talks and act like a little girl? Sad…
| |
|
WP#21
Oct 01, 2007
7:04 PM | | | ; |
you kno what ? .. good game Demons .. thats all im sayin
| |
|
Man
Oct 01, 2007
8:33 PM | | | ; |
Oh man I love this league, you guys are great
| |
|
55 WP
Oct 01, 2007
8:34 PM | | | ; |
joker is absolutely right....
that little chunk from the goonies broke thru that o-line all day and would`ve had an int for a TD...my game did the talkin...good luck next week....suckas
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 01, 2007
8:35 PM | | | ; |
Seriously. You guys are great reading material.
| |
|
hmmm
Oct 01, 2007
9:58 PM | | | ; |
litle chunk from goonies was a bit smaller and better looking than wp55.
| |
|
Heh
Oct 01, 2007
10:31 PM | | | ; |
Lol you didnt break thru nothing, damn O-line can only block for so long, he had all day to throw the ball, and he was the back up QB driving up and down the field. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it, we will see you guys again and hopefully it will be just as entertaining.See ya
| |
|
pack #3
Oct 01, 2007
10:39 PM | | | ; |
your right joker, that 1st td was a blown coverage thats y he was wide open, and the early jump on my saftey, thats it. and a doug flutie miracle catch on 4th and 20... its funny yall shook our hands and afterwards come back to this board talkn smack on how it should`ve or could`ve been. it shouldn`t have been a close game, it should`ve been a shutout
| |
|
55 WP
Oct 01, 2007
10:46 PM | | | ; |
Im done talking....see me on Sundays
| |
|
Puppy Pack
Oct 01, 2007
11:34 PM | | | ; |
Damn the Puppy Pack talks so much ... but they look so bad ... They need to stop talkin...
Hokies is the only ones that are even worth watchin ... its pretty bad watching them play on sundays!
| |
|
wait
Oct 02, 2007
0:14 AM | | | ; |
I thought the penetrators were the best team in the league, they have the best oline, dline, wrs, and qb according to one of their players
| |
|
cr%ig k#m
Oct 02, 2007
0:43 AM | | | ; |
the hokies saftey is so strong and fast.
there qb is fast but not as strong, you can see it in his arm.
chuck norris`s #3 is pretty good...prob cause he is half asian.
wp have a lot of fat linemen.
| |
|
Anonymous
Oct 02, 2007
2:37 AM | | | ; |
Hmmmm, im looking at this thread and i see a bunch of the Demons talking alot of smack. i believe they said they were going to treat the wolfpack like a red headed step child and that they were going to beat the wolfpack 45-12. So when it came time to play, the Wolfpack won. So, now the Demons are still talking trash to the team they lost to. WHat does that say to the rest of us? All talk. NO FOLLOW THROUGH. BACKUP QB or NOT. A WIN is A WIN. A LOSS is A LOSS. You all knew that you`re starting quarterback was going to be out and yet you still talk ****. So blame you`r fat littleman in the coat for the loss. He talked a big game and didnt deliver. Nice.
| |
|
shazam
Oct 02, 2007
2:43 AM | |
Spectator
Oct 02, 2007
2:45 AM | | | ; |
I watched the whole game on sunday between the Demons and the Wolfpack. I can honestly say that the Demons did not have it in the 1st half. They couldn`t get to WP`s quarterback. They let him sit in the pocket and pick apart their defense all day in the 1st half. WP could have scored with 3 minutes left in the 1st, but bad time management halted their last drive. The 2nd half was a totally different story. Both teams went back and forth and the Demons had some good 4th down plays especially the touchdown. But in the end, a missed extra point was the difference and that was the ball game. WP was lucky to run away with the game. But to end all of this, Demons talked a big game but didn`t deliver. WP didn`t say anything and won with class. In my view, Demons are 1-3. WP is 2-2. WP have talent and speed, they just need to get it together consistently granted this is only their 2nd season in the IFFL.
| |
|
q^@n!t0p
Oct 02, 2007
4:07 AM | | | ; |
the hokies safety has nice hair and big muscles
| |
|
C League Viewer
Oct 02, 2007
7:57 AM | | | ; |
QB: between hokies qb(good arm, can scramble or penatrators (great arm)
RB: wolfpack(very quick, can break defense)
WR: N.T.A.C and Penatrators, dont know #s (fast)
the rest i really have to wait and see..
- the scout on the bleachers
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 02, 2007
8:30 AM | | | ; |
I think you`re thinking of #20 for The Penetrators for WR.
| |
|
asfda
Oct 02, 2007
8:51 AM | | | ; |
#86, #21, and #20 ...I think from the penetrators are also fast WRs. That`s the thing about that team...if their o-line is decent and can hold off the rush even just for a couple of seconds, the QB is quick to get the ball out to three quick a$$ receivers...that`s the only reason they`re winning. They sucked last season. They have a new QB. The one they had last season was a middle school joke...they replaced him midseason. But let`s not forget about d-line....their rush is decent, it`s their safeties and corners who have been making the difference for them.
I agree with the Hokie assessment. The qb has some mad scramble skills...he`s the league MVP so far. Too bad we are not having an allstar game.
NTAC, Demons, and the Practice Squad all need some conditioning. They look like wet noodles in the second half.
Auld...you`re just lucky.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 02, 2007
9:54 AM | | | ; |
I agree 100% with the conditioning statement. I think (and I could be wrong) if you go back and look, P-Squad has been in (or leading) every game at half time. We just seem to fall apart in the second half.
| |
|
Dfence
Oct 02, 2007
11:42 AM | | | ; |
wp #5 and #3 by far the best cover corners so far and will be tested this weekend against penetrators speedy recievers and quick qb
| |
|
Hahaha
Oct 02, 2007
12:23 PM | | | ; |
Nice hair and big muscles, lmao, too damn funny
| |
|
????
Oct 02, 2007
1:18 PM | | | ; |
the hokies qb has no scrambling skills.....cant even scramble eggs
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 02, 2007
4:18 PM | | | ; |
My play will speak for its self. Good game WP you guys are far superior and we could learn a ton from your solid play. I look forward to a rematch in the playoffs. Best of luck.
| |
|
Message to Mr. Bundy
Oct 02, 2007
5:17 PM | | | ; |
It looks like you need to have your players build up on their stamina.....jog, run....do something! Save them!
| |
|
Gametime
Oct 02, 2007
5:21 PM | | | ; |
So what is everyones game of the week? My game of the week is the Wolfpack vs. the Penetrators.....an Outstanding defense vs. an offense that may cause some problems if WP#16, 5 and the QB have their way......I noticed that these teams played last season and the pack killed them 20-6, but it doesn`t look like they will be playing the same team. I`m expecting fireworks!
| |
|
Mr. Curiosity
Oct 02, 2007
5:23 PM | | | ; |
Just wondering who thinks the Hokies are going down in the regular season? It`s looking like they will be undefeated until their last game.....Just my thoughts
| |
|
wp77
Oct 02, 2007
5:31 PM | | | ; |
Best safety #2 from wolfpack leading in the c league in INT`s
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 02, 2007
5:57 PM | | | ; |
We need to do something. I honestly believe we have the talent to be successful, hopefully we`ll pull something together soon!
| |
|
mr pick em`
Oct 02, 2007
6:13 PM | | | ; |
Looks like some great match ups this week guys. Here are my picks of the week.
Wolfpack will go on to a 2 game win streak over Penetrators
Hokies as much as we all want to see them lose will stay undefeated with a win over NTAC
Chuck Norris is gonna find themselves grinding out a win with a young Practice squad with alot of potential
Auld Shebeen mite also find some difficulties getting past the Demons this weekend. But Auld Shebeen will come out with the W (should be a great game)
| |
|
î
Oct 02, 2007
6:38 PM | | | ; |
i dont think the hokies will lose at all. theyre offense cannot be stopped.
| |
|
predictions
Oct 02, 2007
6:50 PM | | | ; |
Looks like some good games this week.
Predictions:
WP and Penetrators: WP will grid out a 20-17 win
Auld Shebeen and Demons: Close game, Auld with a 14-13 victory
Chuck Norris and Practice Squad: 14-6 Chuck
And NTAC will upset the Hokies 35-32. Hokies secondary isn`t that good and NTAC will be able to move the ball without a problem.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 02, 2007
6:59 PM | | | ; |
I want to know more NTAC. I haven`t seen them play yet, but it sounds like they have quite an offense. Any `scouting` out there on em?
| |
|
all talk...
Oct 02, 2007
9:38 PM | | | ; |
Al Bundy, they talk alot. That`s about it...
| |
|
C league observer
Oct 02, 2007
9:49 PM | | | ; |
My picks are:
Best Scrambling qb is Hokies.
Qb with the strongest arm I must say goes to practice squads, he can launch it pretty far out to bad he throws too many INTs
Qb with best accuracy is Penetrators
Qb whos decent and gets bailed out alot by his WRs goes to "puppy pack" QB
No team really has a beast O-Line
Best D-line: Bald Asian guy on practice squad hes a monster bull rushing over people, small asian guy on wolfpack he just flys by linemen, black fella with shades on Penetrators hes a qb sacking machine.
Defensive player of the league goes to Hokies Safety hes all over the field, always around the ball. Running up be WP`s safety hes a ball hawk.
Best 1-2 punch would be Hokies Qb and his one receiver.
Thats all for now....Good luck on sunday boys.
| |
|
abc
Oct 02, 2007
10:04 PM | | | ; |
which hokie receiver are you talking about?
| |
|
i think
Oct 02, 2007
10:13 PM | | | ; |
the key to beating the hokies is to throw deep on them
| |
|
yes
Oct 02, 2007
10:34 PM | | | ; |
that makes great sense.....throw it deep to the best safety in the league
| |
|
WP#21
Oct 02, 2007
10:43 PM | |
mr pick em`
Oct 02, 2007
10:55 PM | | | ; |
thats actually not a bad idea. hokies usually play 1 safty till someone beat them. they love to give up the short passes
| |
|
WP#21
Oct 02, 2007
11:16 PM | | | ; |
our team beat the Hokies in a turkeybowl championship last fall .. i wasnt on the team but i kno that they beat the hokies deep alot and thast how they beat them .. too bad that was a 7 on 7 tournament .. and this is 8 on 8
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 02, 2007
11:17 PM | | | ; |
Man, I`m glad someone recognized our boy Jay ( Bald Asian guy :) ). He`s one of the most physical rushers I`ve seen, and he`s pure nasty. We added a couple new guys to the D-line last Sunday, and I think we`ve got a real solid rush now. I think our biggest weakness on D has been missed pulls.
I also agree that #27 (Black guy with the shades) on The Penetrators is a great rusher. His speed coming off the end of the line is a huge strength, and we wound up chipping on him and then double teaming him to keep him off the QB.
On a tangent, I think it would be a neat feature if there were online rosters. I know its not necessarily a reasonable thought but I feel like we haven`t faced an opponent that I don`t respect. And in turn, I wish I had a name to put to the players that I have a high amount of respect for, so when I talk about the players I think are great, I can use their name instead of their race or physical characteristics to reference them.
Sincerely,
The Fat White Guy with a Celtic Tattoo on His Right Arm.
| |
|
t0uch2much
Oct 03, 2007
3:35 AM | | | ; |
anyone keeping track of their stats??
TD`s:
Sacks:
INTs:
Rec yds:
Rushing yds:
just curious to see who stands out on each team
| |
|
t0uch2much
Oct 03, 2007
3:40 AM | | | ; |
anyone keeping track of their stats??
TD`s:
Sacks:
INTs:
Rec yds:
Rushing yds:
just curious to see who stands out on each team and in the C league
| |
|
WP#16
Oct 03, 2007
7:48 AM | | | ; |
thanks for givin the pack some respect yall...we have a lot of weapons..juss needa put sh*t together..but best of luck to all that plays this sunday...and hopefully my leg gets better...err dammit
| |
|
??????
Oct 03, 2007
8:50 AM | | | ; |
the hokies suck.....just like the hokie team down in blacksburg
| |
|
kcha0
Oct 03, 2007
11:09 AM | |
prediction
Oct 03, 2007
11:18 AM | | | ; |
penetrators win
practice squad beats chuck
shebeen shuold beat demons
NTAC over the Hokies if they can get their guys involved, their D played good except against auld shebeen...they were up a lot and got sloppy
| |
|
WP#21
Oct 03, 2007
11:20 AM | | | ; |
dont hate on a team thats 4-0 .. as far as i kno .. they been blowin ppl out .. they got my respect .. see yall at turkeybowl
| |
|
Huh
Oct 03, 2007
12:43 PM | | | ; |
how are the wolfpack, penentrator, and demons any better than the past season....i remember neither of them could put up any points
| |
|
Answer
Oct 03, 2007
12:47 PM | | | ; |
wolfpack slimmed down there squad to half what they had in the spring. they have the potential. they need a qb
penetrators lost most of the senior citizens that were on the team in the spring. they have new talent. not sure about chemistry
demons. who the fcuk are they. lol. a lot of talk and no walk.
| |
|
A+++
Oct 03, 2007
1:20 PM | | | ; |
My Mom is 50 yrs old and 100 lbs over weight and still could beat any C Player.
| |
|
FFF
Oct 03, 2007
1:28 PM | | | ; |
I feel sorry for your ass,tell your old obese mom to swallow next time.
| |
|
WP#16
Oct 03, 2007
1:38 PM | | | ; |
to A+++: lmao, ask her to suit up then, proly be a decent linemen ey..
to "huh": we put up points every game last season, nuttin less than a td, just shifted our D around too much, result in some Losses, but we got it together this fall
| |
|
Watcher
Oct 03, 2007
1:42 PM | | | ; |
what team not to "SLEEP" on that has potential to give other teams trouble??
| |
|
D48
Oct 03, 2007
1:43 PM | | | ; |
now thats a good come back FFF. just had to give u props
| |
|
good question
Oct 03, 2007
1:45 PM | | | ; |
I think it would be any or all teams....
any given sunday baby
| |
|
yeah
Oct 03, 2007
1:55 PM | | | ; |
yeah that Hokie team sucks,
4-0 means you suck. guess 1-3 means you`re great.
You make no sense kid.
And to A+++ get a life, I`m sure ur fat mom is proud of her sons accomplishments in the reston flag football league. way better than playing in the big leauges, or even nfl europe or arena ball. stop talkin like u got skills, or else u wouldn`t be here.
| |
|
Haters
Oct 03, 2007
2:05 PM | | | ; |
Answer what team are you with?
| |
|
answer
Oct 03, 2007
2:08 PM | | | ; |
im just a fan of the game. i dont play.
| |
|
Haters
Oct 03, 2007
2:33 PM | | | ; |
So what does that make you? easy to talk smack when you dont play right? jock sniffer
| |
|
PUMBA WP77
Oct 03, 2007
3:06 PM | | | ; |
YOO D48 WHERE YOU BEEN SON HAVEN`T HEARD FROM YOU ON THE BOARD IN AWHILE HAAH
GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE THIS SUNDAY PENT THIS SHOULD BE A GOOD ONE SEE YALL ON SUNDAY
-PUMBA WP77
| |
|
yuuup
Oct 03, 2007
3:20 PM | | | ; |
my picks
hokies over N.T.A.C
wolf pack over penetrators
chuck over practice squad
auld shebeen over Demons
| |
|
viewer
Oct 03, 2007
3:26 PM | |
advice
Oct 03, 2007
3:38 PM | | | ; |
wolfpack has some good wideouts ... but the line is garbage ... and the qb needs mad work ... they are a few peices away from a chip
| |
|
D48
Oct 03, 2007
3:45 PM | | | ; |
hey wats up man, yea i havent been as active in the fall post like i was in the spring ones. with Armardas #3 now in the A level as Arsenals #3 the post just arent the same. anyways we got a tough match againts the Hokies this weekend so if u guys have any pointers, spill ur GUTS! {great show BTW}
| |
|
well
Oct 03, 2007
4:12 PM | | | ; |
According to half the post, the Hokies (4-0) suck.
| |
|
????
Oct 03, 2007
4:37 PM | | | ; |
just all out blitz the hokies qb, he is not as good as a scrambler as most say. his arm is really weak. most of their plays are a result of luck when he rolls out and throws it to the receiver with nice hair.
| |
|
observer
Oct 03, 2007
5:10 PM | | | ; |
On defense, the Hokies CB`s are decent, but can be exposed. Especially #15; for the games i watched, he was their slowest corner and wasn`t very athletic either. You can just throw a quick slant to the receiver and just run right by him.
| |
|
Sideline observer
Oct 03, 2007
8:39 PM | | | ; |
So the hokies are 4-0 and the Practice squad is 0-4. BUT how is it that the Practice squad is the only team to put up 21 points against the undefeated hokies?
my picks for the week are:
wp over penetrators
chuck over practice squad
shebeen and demons (toss up)
Hokies stay undefeated
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 03, 2007
9:02 PM | | | ; |
It`s cause we`re the best winless team in C ;)
| |
|
but
Oct 03, 2007
10:35 PM | | | ; |
the point differential that game was still more than 3 tds like their other games.
| |
|
cocker spaniel
Oct 04, 2007
1:08 AM | | | ; |
wolfpack. . . more like sheeppack.. lame
| |
|
t0uch2much
Oct 04, 2007
2:09 AM | | | ; |
****er spaniel?? good one you homo.... see me on the the field.. i will piss on you like the ***** type dog that you are.. all this talk but no action the field!
| |
|
i agree
Oct 04, 2007
8:25 AM | | | ; |
#15 is the hokies weakest corner. whichever receiver he`s stickin is going to be open all day. your receivers will burn him deep.
| |
|
haters
Oct 04, 2007
12:25 PM | | | ; |
So many haters out there. Leave the Wolfpack alone. They are out there having fun just like the rest of us. I mean if we were getting paid for this S**t then i can understand the hate. Anyways have a good one.
| |
|
Way 2 go guys
Oct 04, 2007
12:27 PM | | | ; |
Good thing u pointed out their weakess player bc now they know he`ll be the target and send extra help to his side. Sidenote Practice Squad is a one half team unfortunatly. If the game were cut in half I wouldn`t doubt that we would be undefeated. Usually leading into halftime in most of the games we implode in the second half.
| |
|
so
Oct 04, 2007
9:35 PM | | | ; |
are the demons actually gonna back up their big talk this week? what do u guys think?
| |
|
skinnyman in big coat
Oct 04, 2007
9:39 PM | | | ; |
sweet and simply answer is NO!!! They suck. PERIOD! NUFF SAID
| |
|
Well
Oct 04, 2007
10:00 PM | | | ; |
Just have to wait and see, lot of crappy teams in the c-division, WP suck with only 2 wins, so don`t know, then NTAC and Practice Squad. I stayed after the game and watched WP and I assume it was the Demons play last Sunday. Sure alot of crap was being said, who cares. They both looked like some sh!t. If WP was anything like they say on this board, it would have been a blow out,but it was a 1 point game like wise with the Demons. You had two crappy teams play a crappy game. WP along with the Demons will be right back in the C division again next year. Hats off to Chuck, Auld and a few others who don`t need to talk crap to go out and play. If you can`t back up what you say, keep your mouths shut. Anyway, good luck to all the teams on Sunday.
| |
|
HAHA
Oct 04, 2007
10:12 PM | | | ; |
U think some of those teams don`t talk trash? U`re a fool, i bet they do, there`s a lot of random jabs at teams, just cause they can just sign the post as whoever they want.
| |
|
Who Cares
Oct 04, 2007
10:39 PM | | | ; |
Game was last Sunday, big deal.
Hokies won`t lose
WP close one over Penetrators
Chuck over Practice
Demnons and Shebeen, no idea, like above post, its a toss up
| |
|
Someone inform them
Oct 04, 2007
11:39 PM | | | ; |
For some reason the P-Squad thinks they`ve always led going into the second half....get over it...your record speaks for itself...wins aren`t a halfway battle...there is no almost...just win this weekend for petes sake....I`m tired of reading this thread.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 04, 2007
11:41 PM | | | ; |
You know, its not like we`re saying we`re better than everyone else. Quite the contrary, we realize we need work. And we haven`t led every game at half time, but we`ve been in every game at half time, so that`s something to build off of.
| |
|
21
Oct 04, 2007
11:51 PM | | | ; |
I`ll take practice squad over chuck
| |
|
get over it!
Oct 04, 2007
11:51 PM | | | ; |
P-squad...get over yourselves until you can win a game...good luck...cuz we`ll all be watching this weekend.
| |
|
I don`t
Oct 05, 2007
0:11 AM | | | ; |
Know, when Chuck comes to play they play. Chuck takes Practice
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 05, 2007
0:29 AM | | | ; |
Seriously, what`s there to get over? We`re not on here talking trash or anything to that nature. We don`t have anything to squawk about, and quite frankly even if we were winning I don`t think we`d say a word.
| |
|
chuck sucks
Oct 05, 2007
1:05 AM | | | ; |
they should be 1-3 but NTAC had to forfeit
| |
|
?
Oct 05, 2007
9:10 AM | | | ; |
this memo went from saying who people thought were best athletes in the C league to this...come on guys...lets get it together
| |
|
C League Network
Oct 05, 2007
10:48 AM | | | ; |
yall killed my thread!!!
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 05, 2007
11:13 AM | | | ; |
Skinny man who do you play for?
| |
|
Skinnyman in big coat
Oct 05, 2007
11:32 AM | | | ; |
Dont you worry my fat friend.
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 05, 2007
2:09 PM | | | ; |
Skinny I would imagine whatever team you play for is the most hydrated team in the league. It must be nice for you in this forum as you can be a invisible just like you are on the field. Or better yet, you must be one of those flag football observers......Tool
| |
|
Diamonds are Forever
Oct 05, 2007
3:57 PM | | | ; |
Oh SNAP! Get `em, Fatman. Skinny, it`s not NUFF SAID because I got some more talking to do. I don`t think you want it with the Fat Man. That coat is too big for you, you need an extra small.
| |
|
Skinnyman in big coat
Oct 05, 2007
4:02 PM | | | ; |
You guys are right. I am a dipsh!t. I have splinters in my skinny ass from the days I rode the pine in youth league.
| |
|
Diamonds are Forever
Oct 05, 2007
5:12 PM | | | ; |
I`m guessing that`s not all you ride.
| |
|
Skinnyman in big coat
Oct 05, 2007
7:12 PM | | | ; |
i do know one thing the demons will not win another game this season.
| |
|
And You Know This!
Oct 05, 2007
8:11 PM | | | ; |
I noticed those teams out there that have coaches have horrible records.....maybe they should get rid of their coaches.......lol
| |
|
Awww
Oct 05, 2007
9:00 PM | | | ; |
You guys just make my day. Yeah, they did kill the thread.
| |
|
how
Oct 05, 2007
9:03 PM | | | ; |
how can u say that? they got a new qb and they`ve promised to give this division the smack down and move to open league play next season with their 1-3 record.
Everyone knows if u make a change in one position, it`ll fix all ur problems, it won`t matter that the other guys on the "team" can`t stop an offense from scoring, THEY GOT A NEW QB!!! football is an individual sport right?
| |
|
Woo
Oct 05, 2007
9:56 PM | | | ; |
Woo Hoo, shut up and play, swear it was girls posting on here
| |
|
Donkey-00
Oct 06, 2007
7:55 AM | | | ; |
Just a word of advise. Do not sleep on the Demons. I can recall them going winless and not scoring a point all of last Fall and then doing a 360 and making it to the semifinals of the Championship. They seem to play their best ball in the end of the season and playoffs. Remember this post.....
| |
|
360?
Oct 06, 2007
9:58 AM | | | ; |
360 puts you facing the same place, i think you meant to say 180 hahaha
| |
|
hahahaha
Oct 06, 2007
10:17 AM | | | ; |
someone failed geometry.
| |
|
the best
Oct 06, 2007
8:09 PM | | | ; |
the center for the wolfpaack iss siiick....
| |
|
Congrats
Oct 07, 2007
12:43 PM | | | ; |
On Practice squad getting their first win against Chuck.
Penetrators beat the Wolfpack
Deamons beat Auld Shebeen in a good game. It was close and came down to about 1:54 sec left in the game when the demons scored the final touchdown, making it 18-13. Great game played by both sides, game could have went either way. FYI, #5 for Auld earned my respect today, good game today guys
| |
|
MR. OBSERVER
Oct 07, 2007
4:22 PM | | | ; |
I have a question to all the "C" leaguers. Who do think is the best team in your division and do you think that they could beat the last two fall and spring champs? Think about it before you post crappy unhonest answers! Lets be real! As far as I can see, there about ten combined players from all teams that have what it takes to advance up to the open league other than the few that already play with open teams. Argue if you must. Just be real!!
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 07, 2007
4:37 PM | | | ; |
Thanks for the congrats!
Mr. Observer --
I haven`t seen any of the other leagues play, aside from C division, so I can`t say who I`d think would beat who. I do think however, there`s plenty of talent in the C division. For example, I`ve watched the Demons for a few minutes the past 2 weeks, and I think they`re a better team than their record indicates. And The Penetrators have some weapons that everyone needs to respect. #20 on their team is SICK, their QB is one of the best in the division and #27 is a top notch pass rusher.
Here`s an even better question, whats the big deal about `advancing` past C? Personally, I understand the thought that you want to be the best in the best division, but I don`t believe that means you can take anything away from teams in the C division just because we don`t play at the same level as you.
It strikes me that the attitude in general is that unless you`re in an open division, you`re not worth a damn. Is that about right?
| |
|
Hmmm
Oct 07, 2007
4:48 PM | | | ; |
Good one Mr Observer. Its hard to tell, it could be anyone, Practice Squad came out and played like they were 4-0, so who is to say. True, there are about 10 or so players that could jump right now to the open. you can take guys from each of the C-division teams and make a squad that could jump to the open. As I see it, anyone of the teams in C could. Its just hard to tell. I would go with the Penetrators, #27 will give QBs fits. Good post Mr.Observer, chime in people, lets hear what you guys think
| |
|
word
Oct 07, 2007
4:54 PM | | | ; |
Ditto man, i watched some open league teams today, level of play wasn`t THAT impressive that these guys should be dissing novice leaguers so much. The players didn`t have great outstanding talent, but they had better chemistry than novice teams.
So take ur ten combined players comment and shove it.
| |
|
Response to MR. OBSERVER
Oct 07, 2007
4:58 PM | | | ; |
I honestly think the top 2 teams would fit well with the Open Division. Can they beat the last 2 fall & spring champs? No. But they can take out some, if not, most of those bottom of the barrell teams in the Open Division. The only difference b/w the Open and Novice is experience. You give these C-leaguers experience and expect them to make some noise! MR. OBSERVER have you seen any of the Novice games? What teams or players do you think stand a chance in the Open Division? Keep it real.
| |
|
Thats
Oct 07, 2007
5:00 PM | | | ; |
What it comes down too it, chemistry is a big part and the longer teams play together the better they are, good day of football out there today in the C-division.
| |
|
MR. OBSERVER
Oct 08, 2007
9:22 PM | | | ; |
"Word" Not real sure if you are looking for a response to your comment or an apology. Either way you must think that I play in the open league and am degrating you and your team. Not the case! You have got to be kidding the entire messageboard viewers when you said that the chemistry was there but the talent was not. Exactly what game or games did you watch? The guys playing with full equipment and helmets are in the pee wee league! If you want a schedule of the open league games, let me know and I can get you headed you in the right direction! Do not take peoples opinions so personal?
| |
|
word
Oct 08, 2007
10:14 PM | | | ; |
Like i said, the talent is good, not all that much greater than people in c league like you say though, the separation is the chemistry. To say there are only 10 players in c league that could play in A is just obnoxious, I`ve watched a couple games at pop tree so unless everyone was just off their game that day, i stand by what i said.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 08, 2007
10:18 PM | | | ; |
How DOES it work? Does every team start in C and then after one year in C do you have the option to move up or do you have to win your division to move up?
| |
|
I
Oct 08, 2007
10:31 PM | | | ; |
Always thought you had to be above .500 to move up, ur guess is as good as mine Al. Good game Sunday by the way
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 08, 2007
10:35 PM | | | ; |
Thanks man. We needed a win. I can`t speak for our coach, but I doubt we`d be looking to move up next season anyway, but it`d be good to know.
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 08, 2007
11:28 PM | | | ; |
Observer I`m surprised you can use a computer. The difference between open league and C is 10 years and 20 pounds. I`ve watched some of the "much better talent" and they are tired. I can assure you chumps there are 5-6 talented players on every team in this league. Our team won two games in the C league last fall in our first season and one against an almighty A league team. We should have a C league v. A league All Start game. C league would whoop that ass. Believe that.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 08, 2007
11:37 PM | | | ; |
That would be fun! I`d love to watch that game! I think we could even send one or two guys to it.
| |
|
Hmm
Oct 09, 2007
0:31 AM | | | ; |
That would be interesting to see. But won`t happen, i`m sure somewhere along the line it has been mentioned before. Interesting though
| |
|
Also
Oct 09, 2007
0:36 AM | | | ; |
The teams in C this year have some serious talent, from the Hokies right down to Practice Squad. Maybe at the end of the season something could be worked out. The Coaches/Captains for C get together and choose from each team in the division. Hmm
| |
|
My thoughts
Oct 09, 2007
7:28 AM | | | ; |
I think all the talent from this fall seasons C-league should get together and play in the Bark Bowl.....that should shut all those trash talkin` A-league teams! What do ya`ll think? Who would be the players from each position? Start posting!
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
9:09 AM | | | ; |
D-Linemen: #99 from P-Squad, #27 from Penetrators. Those two together would be nasty.
WR: #20 from Penetrators
I haven`t watched enough of the other games to tell who plays what, but all of the big boys from Demons seem to be a serious talent, and my brother said that their guy in the middle was bad ass too. I think #16 from Wolf Pack seems to be their best player. I just don`t know where you`d put him. WR or DB?
Obviously at QB everyone seems to love the Hokies man, so I`d say him based on that, with the Penetrators QB as well. Of course if our man keeps bringing it like he did last week, he`d be a standout too. I still think he`s got the best arm in the league.
O-Linemen: I guess it would depend on whether you want blockers or receivers or the best mixture of both. I really have no clue on this one.
I get most of my observations in game, so since I`m never watching down field I really don`t know who has the best DBs and such.
| |
|
Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey
Oct 09, 2007
9:44 AM | | | ; |
Did you know the C league stands for the Clowns` league? I would love for you guys to put together an all star game. I haven`t been to the circus in awhile.
| |
|
Funny
Oct 09, 2007
9:47 AM | | | ; |
These so called best players in the C league would be average players and fighting for playing time in the open division.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
9:56 AM | | | ; |
Why do you guys hate so much? I think this `all-star` game should happen. I`d take time out of my day to watch it.
| |
|
Just
Oct 09, 2007
9:57 AM | | | ; |
Like the average players in the open division fighting for playing time. There are about 3-4 maybe 5 teams that are actually pretty damn good in the open league.
| |
|
hmm
Oct 09, 2007
10:00 AM | | | ; |
Its just a game fellas. Don`t be too serious about it now.you guys act like the open league is the damn NFL.
| |
|
MR. OBSERVER
Oct 09, 2007
10:03 AM | | | ; |
mmm i love when open league teams bukkake my face
| |
|
MR. OBSERVER
Oct 09, 2007
10:03 AM | | | ; |
mmm i love when open league teams bukkake my face
| |
|
Open
Oct 09, 2007
10:03 AM | | | ; |
League has garbage teams just like the rest of the divisons, get over yourselves
| |
|
MR. OBSERVER
Oct 09, 2007
10:03 AM | | | ; |
mmm i love when open league teams bukkake my face
| |
|
Facts
Oct 09, 2007
10:19 AM | | | ; |
First of all, Fata8s in his little brother`s coat started the sh*t by saying "We should have a C league v. A league All Start game. C league would whoop that ass. Believe that." Are you serious? The C league wounldn`t even make it past the 50 yard line. And second, know your history it takes 3 years on average for a C league champion to even be competitive in the open division. Look at the history.
| |
|
Diamonds are Forever
Oct 09, 2007
10:40 AM | | | ; |
Facts, you are a d!ckriding c0cknocker. I would like to know some of the credentials for the stars of the open league. Did you even play in high school? If you think you`re stopping me you`re out of your tree.
| |
|
Geesh
Oct 09, 2007
10:51 AM | | | ; |
I love you guys, you just make my day
| |
|
Facts
Oct 09, 2007
10:52 AM | | | ; |
Trust me, I`ve gotten much further and much more out of football then you have and I`m not even talking about this flag league. You may be tearing up the C league along with Jay-Z nuts right now. But when your team moves up next year, I want to see if you’re tearing up the open division. I guarantee at this time next year, 5 games into the season, your team won`t even have 2 wins in the open division.
| |
|
MR. OBSERVER
Oct 09, 2007
11:01 AM | | | ; |
Facts, trust me open league makes me so horny. Flag football is life, all you c-league teams can suck a nut. This league defines me and you all can go hang out with P Diddy and stay in your novice division.
| |
|
Hey
Oct 09, 2007
11:03 AM | | | ; |
Whats wrong with P-Diddy? He play flag football too? LMAO flag football is life huh? You goober
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
11:07 AM | | | ; |
It looks like Arsenals moved up this year, and they seem to be doing fine. Outcast also seemed to do well when they moved up in 2004. Spadling did ok their first year after moving up in 2004 and went 6-1 in 2005. The only team I`m seeing that moved up and hasn`t won at least 3 to 4 games are Southside Grays. So I don`t think you`ve got your facts exactly straight.
| |
|
Hmm
Oct 09, 2007
11:10 AM | | | ; |
Makes you horny playing with a bunch of guys on Sunday? Anything you want to tell us? And thats something to tell somebody, err my defineing moment and what defines me is playing flag football. Classic. You guys are still great though
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
11:10 AM | | | ; |
Oops, didn`t notice Clubhouse, but they still pulled 2 wins. But DWC and United both moved up well that same year (2006).
| |
|
True
Oct 09, 2007
11:14 AM | | | ; |
Arsenals do have some talent and seem to be holding their own, rarely do you see a team jump from C to open and do well, besides the teams that were mentioned. because like some of the previous posts, there is chemistry with those teams, and not to mention some serious talent.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
11:21 AM | | | ; |
Personal opinion, and I`ve argued with my brother over this, I think a team that has either a) had the time to gel and work together as a unit or b) has great chemistry with each other can overcome most teams with better talent.
Football IS the ultimate team sport, every man on the field has to do his job or the whole play will break down. In general, talent without cohesiveness will lose. I think if you look at the top teams in ANY division, and you`ll probably find guys who grew up together, drink together, hang out on the weekends together etc.
So, in retrospect, I`m not sure a C league all-star team would beat an open division team, but I do think they could compete. And I do think teams that have that togetherness (Hokies, Penetrators for starters) could make the transition without too much trouble.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
11:22 AM | | | ; |
And I`d still go see the game ;) Tom, what are the chances of it happening?
| |
|
Facts
Oct 09, 2007
11:30 AM | | | ; |
Like I said it takes about three years to be competitive when making the jump. The current teams in C will definitely take 3+ years to be competitive in open.
| |
|
Don`t forget about...
Oct 09, 2007
11:36 AM | | | ; |
showering together Al...I find that to be the ultimate team bonding experience
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
11:38 AM | | | ; |
I disagree. It seems a few teams need that time, but mostly it seems they stay competitive. They aren`t necessarily winning the division, but they`re in there.
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
11:39 AM | | | ; |
I don`t shower. It helps to keep opponents at bay.
| |
|
To Facts
Oct 09, 2007
11:41 AM | | | ; |
As Al pointed out, several teams that have done well in C have also done well in their first season in open. Where are you getting this 3 years (which teams), and how did those teams fare in C?
This isn`t like the NFL vs NCAA where the best from one are taken to the next level. Athletically you could have a C league team that is much better than an open league team. If that C league team also happens to know how to play flag, then you`ve got a competitive game.
| |
|
my 2 cents
Oct 09, 2007
11:43 AM | | | ; |
I`m pretty sure that if your .500 or better and you want to keep your same team name you need to move up to the open. Not sure how Chuck stayed in C but oh well.
Like other said, most C teams that move up usually don`t hold their own due to the big difference in experience. You can get away with plays in C that more than likely wouldn`t work against an experienced Open league team. And I agree have to applaud Arsenals for doing surprisingly well.
This seems to be the topic every season. C league has talent, while the open has experience. In all honesty, I`d take a team full of experienced players > team of athletes.
| |
|
question
Oct 09, 2007
12:31 PM | | | ; |
what happens to teams with 0.000 in open league? Do they move down to C?
| |
|
right
Oct 09, 2007
12:40 PM | | | ; |
but every year, open league guys say they`ll destroy the C league without any basis for it. the majority of good C league teams that have moved up have been competitive, which means C league teams aren`t pushovers.
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 09, 2007
1:22 PM | | | ; |
Experience = Old Timers. This argument is like the old school NFL players saying they are more talented than today`s players...Observer you are a slipper full of sh!t. Just because you`ve played in this league for 14 years doesnt make you more talented. I will take the C Leagues best talent and put it against the immortal A team all stars and I will stop talking when you beat us. Until that point you can suck a ....
Tom, can we pay for an All-Star game? Make sure the location is Baron Cameron so the old timers dont have to walk so far to the field. Wouldnt want to hear any tired excuses.
| |
|
I agree
Oct 09, 2007
1:55 PM | | | ; |
Fatman is hilarious...No doubt there is a lot of talent in the C.
Who`d win:
Hokies vs Diesel
Penetrators vs Outlaws
Chuck vs Midgets
Bottom barrel open league teams vs the top 3 C teams.
| |
|
Well
Oct 09, 2007
3:30 PM | | | ; |
Outlaws at full strength would slaughter rule the Penetrators. Don`t forget this team has lost their quarterback from the spring and were in the final four of the spring. From what I`ve seen it looks like they have been having trouble fielding 8 guys every week.
| |
|
Facts
Oct 09, 2007
3:46 PM | | | ; |
Fata*s in drag, please pass me whatever it is that you`re smoking.
| |
|
hold up
Oct 09, 2007
4:49 PM | | | ; |
Chuck is a top c league team?
| |
|
Al Bundy
Oct 09, 2007
5:11 PM | | | ; |
They are third in the standings right now.
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 09, 2007
5:45 PM | | | ; |
Facts that was creative. You must have sat at your PC and thought about that one all day. Kuddos. Any time you and your A league team wants to bring it let us know and it will be brought.
| |
|
Fatman in Little Coat
Oct 09, 2007
5:47 PM | | | ; |
My bad Facts this invitiation isnt open to observers. We actually want to play against real teams.
| |
|
Didn`t Chuck
Oct 09, 2007
5:56 PM | | | ; |
Lose 2 the P-squad? They shouldn`t be in the top 3, if they lost to the last place team! LMAO.....That **** is hilarious!
| |
|
Sorry I`m late.......
Oct 09, 2007
6:19 PM | | | ; |
QB:
RB:
WR:
TE:
OL:
DL:
CB:
LB:
S:
I`d choose the entire defense from Penetrators.....along with #16 (safety) & #5 (corner) from WP......#5 (corner) from Auld Shebeen, 99 from P-Squad.......QBs: Hokies, Penetrators, P-Squad (what a f*ckin arm!)........WRs all of the Hokies and Penetrators......linemen #36 & 13 from Demons....#36 also has great hands! 77 from Wolfpack, Al Bundy from P-Squad (after seeing wut he did to Chuckies D-linemen...you have my respect!) & the Penetrators O-line.....Let me know if you agree or disagree with my selections!
| |
|
WP#21
Oct 09, 2007
8:05 PM | | | ; |
i can just tell you .. that .. Arsenal [Armada] from the SPring C league .. is 3-2 right now before losing to PAIN .. and they were ranked int he top 20 in VA .. so .. to the guy that says .. it takes a new team in the opren league 3 years to be competitive .. you are wrong .. their playing real well right now .. its not all about experience .. its about chemistry also .. when everyone on the team knows their role .. then any team can do good .. ofc ourse u have to have alittle talent too .. that wouldnt hurt
| |
|
|