Messageboard
subject: "Scores of today`s games?"
Interested
Jun 10, 2007 10:59 AM | | ;
|
What were the scores of today`s games? Yes, I would like someone to race home from the fields, and update me.
|
| |
|
i saw
Jun 10, 2007 11:30 AM | | ; |
badboyz roll lazy right off the field. lazy is thru.
| |
|
loser
Jun 10, 2007 12:24 PM | |
G- Money
Jun 10, 2007 12:44 PM | | ; |
vegas nights 19
overrated 6
| |
|
LOL
Jun 10, 2007 2:56 PM | | ; |
Were the Novas and Wolves games as close as the scores indicate?
| |
|
On looker
Jun 10, 2007 3:07 PM | | ; |
CLOSER!!! The wolves won with an interception return for a TD and a safety. Their D is very good. Next week should be a good defensive battle
| |
|
i heard...
Jun 10, 2007 3:09 PM | | ; |
I heard that the Wolves-AMM game was as close as it sounded. Heard the game was 7-7 till a Wolves int for TD towards the end of the game sealed it. But i heard there was a safety in there somewhere...not sure when.
Saw the Novas-Playmakers game and it looked like the Novas had it under control for most of the game. They had 2 ints the first half and long controlled drives on offense. Playmakers had one long strike for their TD, but didn`t have many other chances.
| |
|
Outlaws won
Jun 10, 2007 3:39 PM | |
Donkey-00-Overrated
Jun 10, 2007 7:51 PM | | ; |
Just wanted to congradulate Vegas on thier victory. Best of luck to you guys in the rest of the play-offs.
| |
|
AM&M to interesting
Jun 10, 2007 10:50 PM | | ; |
Jim doesn`t play for us. But more importantly, good teams find ways to win games and Wolves found a way to win. The safety was fairly meaningless (4th & 35, under 2 min). But i`ll always take a tie game w/under 3min & the ball @ midfield against a good team. Next time.... See you guys next spring.
| |
|
re: score
Jun 11, 2007 7:09 PM | | ; |
Score means nothing. AM&M should have won but gave the game away to the Wolves, you`re welcome.
| |
|
Your a F-ing moron
Jun 11, 2007 8:21 PM | | ; |
I do believe that in every sport the team or person with the better SCORE wins. Who is moving on to the final four? The four teams that had the highest score at the end of the game you ignorant F**k!!! My guess is you also live by the saying that "winning isn`t everything."
| |
|
Point
Jun 11, 2007 8:23 PM | | ; |
Well he does bring up a very good point.
| |
|
AM&M #13
Jun 11, 2007 10:53 PM | | ; |
i`m hoping no one on AM&M is saying we dominated and we could`ve won; `cause that wasn`t the game i saw from the middle of the field. I saw a great game that could`ve gone either way, but the better team won in the end. Both teams justified their seeding - what more can you ask for.
| |
|
Socrates
Jun 15, 2007 9:26 AM | | ; |
If what Onlooker`s recap is true, it sounds like defense did dominate. If there`s only one offensive touchdown per team in a flag football game, that means either the defense dominated or the offenses were totally incompetent. Looks like "interesting......" thinks AMAM offense sucked. Yet their offense scored as much as wolves offense. That would logically indicate wolves offense sucked too, correct? Yet he fails to point this out. Hmmmm. Could "interesting...... " be a Wolf?
| |
|
|