Messageboard
subject: "Analysis of League`s Winless Clubs"
Opinions
May 09, 2007
1:04 PM | | ;
|
Anyone have any opinions on the team`s below?
Over Rated
Hounds
Clubhouse
Entourage
CRISAK
|
| |
|
Keeper
May 09, 2007
1:06 PM | | | ; |
They are teams having a hard time adjusting to the speed and talent in the open division. Just like any other team...it just takes time. Don`t hate on them. They are out there to have fun like everyone else on Sunday mornings.
| |
|
Reply
May 09, 2007
1:22 PM | | | ; |
Overated- Moved up from Novice in Fall 2006 (Champions). Strong team adjusting to Open Division.
Clubhouse- B league runner up last year to Outkast.
| |
|
Crisak
May 09, 2007
3:22 PM | | | ; |
is the best of the bunch when they have their full squad. These vets know how to play and could make a run in the B playoffs if they get a favorable draw and their QB can keep his cool.
and no, I don`t play for them.
| |
|
Anal Retentive Gambler
May 09, 2007
3:26 PM | | | ; |
Yeah, I have an opinion..
Bet against all of them!
| |
|
hah
May 09, 2007
3:38 PM | | | ; |
Even with a full squad, Crisak still got waxed by Wolves, United, and even Diesel.
| |
|
Keeper
May 09, 2007
3:41 PM | | | ; |
Crisak should have a full squad this weekend. Everyone should be back from being suspended.
Crisak plays Outlaws and Union.
I know for sure they will not beat Outlaws.
I think Union will get thier first win this weekend.
| |
|
1`s Not Much Better
May 09, 2007
5:08 PM | | | ; |
The teams with one win could just as easy be on this list to. I watched Suck Bowl I between Club House and the Raw Dawgs play this past weekend and that game could`ve been a 0-0 tie. Even though they won the Dawgs should be on this list because of their lack of offense and their HUGE piont differential.
| |
|
#80 Novas
May 10, 2007
1:06 PM | | | ; |
I think they will adjust after this season and be more competitive in the Fall. Clubhouse played well against us, but simply made some poor play calls. I think they`ll be the suprise team in the Fall who`s most improved.
| |
|
Agree with #80
May 10, 2007
1:38 PM | | | ; |
It`s an adjustment thang. Some of these teams are new to the league, new to this level, or breaking in new team members. Once the newness fades and the squads start to gel, there is no reason that any of these squads will not become competitive and make an impact in this league.
Seriously, has there ever really been a team that has consistently stunk up the league year in and year out?
| |
|
Hounds
May 10, 2007
2:23 PM | | | ; |
Hounds / More Cowbell / Broadlands Pub has sucked it up regularly of late, and they`re currently on a 13 game losing skid. Just cause you change your name doesn`t mean that you`re new and still adjusting.
In the novice division, for all the talking Chuck Norris really hasn`t done too much in three novice seasons. Lotsa talk to start this season though it looks like Irreverence has an edge on them. Maybe next season Chuck!
| |
|
beware
May 13, 2007
7:49 AM | | | ; |
you have been warned.. you know who we are..
| |
|
Hounds
May 13, 2007
6:45 PM | | | ; |
Hounds actually beat Over Rated 7-0 - but it has yet to be posted.
| |
|
|