| idea | 3:31 PM |
I think its rediculous Mutiny or Outlawz will be in the final four. Thats the worst 2 teams left getting to play each other next. Here is my idea for the next round:
Novas/Mutiny then winner plays winner of, Lazy/All Makes
same thing with, Wolves/Outlawz BadBoyz/Playmakers
How about let the teams vote on it? |
|
| sorry | 3:37 PM |
it is what it is son |
|
| #21 | 3:39 PM |
Wrong!!! Mutiny earned the right at a shot to be in the final four by beating the Rhinos. |
|
| me too | 3:48 PM |
I like the idea let the teams vote on it! |
|
| The voice of reason | 4:02 PM |
Yeah..maybe the NCAA tournament should start re-seeding as well so there are no more George Masons. We all know that wasn`t fun to watch. What a dumb idea. |
|
| hmmm | 4:05 PM |
If a 16 beats a 1, they should play the 8/9 seed..... * re-seeding would mean that when there is 5 undefeated teams, and one of them gets the 1 seed do to point differential in totaly diferent divisions, playing diferent teams, that they would have the way statisticaly paved for them to the championship game. Its been thought of, and not ever used for a reason. |
|
| Think about it | 4:10 PM |
If you plan on re-seeding you would have to do it in both round 2 (quarters) and the semis. In this case, for the Mutiny to win it all, they would have to beat #1 (Rhinos), #2 (Novas), #3 (Wolves in Semis) and then #4(Badboyz in Championship). This example****umes the higher seeds win out. Mutiny earned any break they may now have by winning round 1.
In this case, you should annoint Mutiny as the greatest IFFL champion of all time! |
|
| Correction | 4:13 PM |
Previous message should have said..."This example****umes the higher seeds.." |
|
| Dumb idea. | 4:18 PM |
Please stop posting. |
|
| A True Observer | 4:22 PM |
I have never heard of anything like this in my sports life!!
I don`t know Mutiny, but based upon the fact that they were 16, they are obviously - so far - the "cinderella" and that`s just how it goes in sportsworld!!
Bad idea!! |
|
| Joe Lunardi | 4:31 PM |
Why have a bracket at all then? If 16 beats 1, they earn the right to play whoever 1 was going to play. Maybe you should have let me do the seeding. |
|
| Student of the game | 08:40 AM |
I do not understand why anyone would think it is ridiculous for Mutiny or Outlawz to be in the final four. Obviously you have never played against either of those teams. Mutiny defense is stiff!! If you think you are going to run up and down the field on them, think again. I believe all their games could have gone either way. Outlawz probably has the most efficient and toughest offense to defend against. I saw the game when these two teams played earlier in the season and it was a dog fight. Probably one of the best games of the season. Gents,the goal of the tournament is not to have the top four teams of the regular season play in the final four. But it is to have teams who have had a good season an opportunity to play for the championship, regardless of seeding. Like they say when it comes to the playoffs, records dont matter. Eitehr win or go home. |
|
| Tom - IFFL | 08:54 AM |
We don`t reseed the brackets, and this is not a league policy we`ll put up for a vote. |
|
| The student has become the teacher | 09:05 AM |
I dont think it could have been said any better than Student of the Game put it. |
|
| net detective | 09:27 AM |
Now who could it be that wants to change the games? We can eliminate Mutiny and Outlaws because obviously its not them so who is left?
I don`t think Wolves would get in a better position if they have to play Outlaws and then Badboyz instead of All Makes and then the Novas so we can eliminate them. Won`t make a difference for All Makes if they play Wolves then the Novas or Lazy then the Novas so we can eliminate them too. Who is left?
I think Playmakers rather play Novas who it looks like they have a good record against then Badboyz again so eliminate them.
That leaves Badboyz,Novas,Lazy. So one of these teams is scared and want to change things around and make it easy for them. Which one is it? |
|
| to detective | 10:05 AM |
Can`t be Novas or Lazy as they have league reps on their teams, so they`d agree to the vote if they wanted to change, that only leaves .... BB`s. |
|
| Q`s | 10:21 AM |
It must be a hater who started the post. Mutiny is a decent team provided they had a offense. Their D is better than average, its that its any given Sunday any team can be beat. Re seeding is ridiculous! |
|
| A True Observer | 10:38 AM |
First off, to the detective: Badboyz would NOT post a dumb**** proposition like this. Not one sport on the planet reseeds brackets. Mutiny - however you guys think it was luck - beat Rhinos...that`s an unfortunate, but life goes on and the brackets should remain as they are. I like what the guy said earlier, I guess the NCAA tournament should reseed brackets when the number 64 team lucks up and beat a number 1 team. I don`t think that the NCAA would even entertain the idea and nor should we!!
It doesn`t matter what the talent level of Outlaws, Mutiny, Lazy, Badboyz or whoever else, the issue on the table is reseeding, and it should NOT be a consideration.
Dumb idea at best! |
|
| Scarry Larry | 12:47 PM |
I wasnt me....or any teammates I am pretty sure...I prefer the NCAA bracket style over re-seeding..its more dramatic
As far as no sport re-seeds....mmm..well
The NFL does...Donkey. Wildcard win dosnt get home field moran.
|
|
| He has a point | 1:08 PM |
Here`s your SIGN |
|
| Just win baby! | 08:28 AM |
The top four teams that are in the playoffs are the teams that won. Those teams earned that right. If you don`t like the results, you need to tell the teams that lost to win their games. |
|
| Seed this | 11:42 AM |
If you`re so gung-ho about reseeding, get some grass seed and head to the fields. The one in Herndon was in particularly terrible shape. |