Shouldn`t the A playoff matchups be:
1 vs 8 (Wolves & Rhinos)
2 vs 7 (Pitbulls & Lazy)
3 vs 6 (Pain & Outlaws)
4 vs 5 (Bad Boyz & Collision)

Wolves make it to finals. Pitbulls make it to finals. Wolves play Pitbulls and lose.

A team that had a kickoff retured for a TD with no blocking can not be that good. I don`t even think the Redskins have gotten a kickoff returned on them.

From the rules:

Example: teams A, B, C are tied in percentage, team A has played both B and C. B has not played C.
*If A won both those games, A (2-0) is first, and then the ranking of B (0-1) and C (0-1) is based on overall point differential for the season.
*If A lost both those games, A (0-2) is third, and then the ranking of B (1-0) and C (1-0) is based on overall point differential for the season.
*If A split those games, A (1-1) is second, the team they beat (0-1) is third, the team who beat them (1-0) is first.


In the above case team A (0-2) is Collision, B (1-0) & C (1-0) are Lazy Sundae and Outlaws.

I think the poster got confuse by looking at the seedings on the Standings page from the http://fall.iffl.us/seasons/2009_Fall link